[DarkMuse]

I predict it will be a good thing. Before the vote was over I made these predictions:

If the UK leaves the EU - This will compel other countries to leave that are being majority affected by this migrant crisis, ultimately sealing the deal for the cancerous and destructive migrants. The German prime minister (the one responsible for almost all of the migrant shit happening in Europe) will be either impeached or someone else will get elected (this is already happening). This will push the migrants back into the middle-east and Africa where they can fuck up their own countries instead of fucking up others, and ultimately kill each other and themselves. Yay!

If the UK remains in the EU - In x years, migrants force themselves into every country of the EU, eventually turning the countries into shitholes (this is currently happening with Germany and Sweden). After x or xx years, another migrant crisis begins due to the countries they turned to shit, and migrants begin pushing their way into Asia, ultimately turning those countries into shitholes as well. After x or xx years once again, either 1. the migrants decide to forcefully take over the Americas or 2. another migrant crisis will happen and they will eventually take over the Americas. At that point, the entire world will be doomed.

If my predictions were correct, then the whole world was just saved by Britian leaving the EU. Thank fuck for that.

I definitely see your point here but the important thing to remember is that a group of people is not defined by individuals. I'm not sure on the statistic of crime in immigrant population or if migration has any effect on said rates but I have a feeling that a majority of immigrants are not violent, nor are they criminals. I think that we should be a lot more strict on who we are letting in. This is especially true for countries who have serious issues as it is and for immigrants from regions  that are already causing problems or are threatening the host country. Immigrants should have a use in the society if and only if the host country needs it. Countries should be able to opt out of immigration altogether if a vote is created but pro-immigration attitudes should be encouraged All people, in my opinion,  deserve to have a place to escape to if their country is in a "bad place" so to speak. Specifically if their country is being violent, suppressive, manipulative, etc. I'm a firm believer in providing aid to those who need it but I will not condone forcing it down peoples throat. I do not believe we should be in other countries fighting wars for people. I do not believe we should be in other countries forcing our own ways onto people. I do believe that we should be there for others if they choose to ask for help but we shall not intervene directly.  Should some power threaten us, then I believe we have the right to  engage, outside of that is asking for trouble. Yeah you can argue that we should be proactive but that is a temptation that spirals out of control quickly. The US moved swiftly from defensive to offensive-defense. It's naive and will end up fucking us over in the future.

As my 1st grade teacher always used to say,
"Nose nose, where it goes."

-DarkMuse

I had a picture of the crime rates in Germany and the percentage of those crimes committed by migrants but I think I either deleted it or just can't find it, also, facts don't care about your feelings. Numbers don't lie and they prove that the majority of migrants are criminals. Here's a wikipedia page that I have bookmarked. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigratio...me#Germany I made it go straight to Germany because they're the country in the EU that's taking in the most migrants. Obviously humans should have the right to leave war-torn countries, but what IS NOT okay is when those people go and tear up their foster countries and re-create what they're apparently running from. Furthermore, it is ignorant to think that only people who legitimately want to escape their country are the only ones migrating. If this were true you wouldn't see videos of Muslims literally saying they're using the immigration crisis as a gateway to Europe in order to shove Islam down the throat of the west. These people are not humans who actually want a home and a nice place to live, these people are a disease that destroy everything they touch and need to be stopped. If they're not stopped, my prediction may become true, but that's only if the political elite decide to ignore Brexit. There's no doubt that Brexit will create a domino effect on countries leaving the EU, which will ultimately force migrants to stay in their home countries and get killed instead of going to other countries and dragging them down with them. A few countries worth of people dead is better than the entire world being ruled by Muslims and shit. As for your statement about not jumping into wars, that is just ignorance. Allies exist for a reason, some countries need allies so they can actually be protected (small and/or poor countries) and some countries just want allies so that they can have more unnecessary power, which is the only kind of "allyship" I disagree with. Also, some allies exist due to historical connections, such as the US and France. By the way, the US will never be fucked over if you're speaking in terms of war. Never. Before you say Vietnam, that was an anomaly due to the foreign lands and jungles they were fighting on. If that were to happen again the US would not lose, I promise.

Why are you signing your post as if I can't read your name???

I don't really know why I started doing that... it's just my thing I suppose. I think that those facts are interesting though and are important to recognize. It's difficult to weed out the shit heads from the people who are truly trying to leave their country for legitimate reasons.

-dankmau5

[Oni]

You know you guys can space your sentences to form paragraphs, right?

[meow]

I definitely see your point here but the important thing to remember is that a group of people is not defined by individuals. I'm not sure on the statistic of crime in immigrant population or if migration has any effect on said rates but I have a feeling that a majority of immigrants are not violent, nor are they criminals. I think that we should be a lot more strict on who we are letting in. This is especially true for countries who have serious issues as it is and for immigrants from regions  that are already causing problems or are threatening the host country. Immigrants should have a use in the society if and only if the host country needs it. Countries should be able to opt out of immigration altogether if a vote is created but pro-immigration attitudes should be encouraged All people, in my opinion,  deserve to have a place to escape to if their country is in a "bad place" so to speak. Specifically if their country is being violent, suppressive, manipulative, etc. I'm a firm believer in providing aid to those who need it but I will not condone forcing it down peoples throat. I do not believe we should be in other countries fighting wars for people. I do not believe we should be in other countries forcing our own ways onto people. I do believe that we should be there for others if they choose to ask for help but we shall not intervene directly.  Should some power threaten us, then I believe we have the right to  engage, outside of that is asking for trouble. Yeah you can argue that we should be proactive but that is a temptation that spirals out of control quickly. The US moved swiftly from defensive to offensive-defense. It's naive and will end up fucking us over in the future.

As my 1st grade teacher always used to say,
"Nose nose, where it goes."

-DarkMuse

I had a picture of the crime rates in Germany and the percentage of those crimes committed by migrants but I think I either deleted it or just can't find it, also, facts don't care about your feelings. Numbers don't lie and they prove that the majority of migrants are criminals. Here's a wikipedia page that I have bookmarked. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigratio...me#Germany I made it go straight to Germany because they're the country in the EU that's taking in the most migrants. Obviously humans should have the right to leave war-torn countries, but what IS NOT okay is when those people go and tear up their foster countries and re-create what they're apparently running from. Furthermore, it is ignorant to think that only people who legitimately want to escape their country are the only ones migrating. If this were true you wouldn't see videos of Muslims literally saying they're using the immigration crisis as a gateway to Europe in order to shove Islam down the throat of the west. These people are not humans who actually want a home and a nice place to live, these people are a disease that destroy everything they touch and need to be stopped. If they're not stopped, my prediction may become true, but that's only if the political elite decide to ignore Brexit. There's no doubt that Brexit will create a domino effect on countries leaving the EU, which will ultimately force migrants to stay in their home countries and get killed instead of going to other countries and dragging them down with them. A few countries worth of people dead is better than the entire world being ruled by Muslims and shit. As for your statement about not jumping into wars, that is just ignorance. Allies exist for a reason, some countries need allies so they can actually be protected (small and/or poor countries) and some countries just want allies so that they can have more unnecessary power, which is the only kind of "allyship" I disagree with. Also, some allies exist due to historical connections, such as the US and France. By the way, the US will never be fucked over if you're speaking in terms of war. Never. Before you say Vietnam, that was an anomaly due to the foreign lands and jungles they were fighting on. If that were to happen again the US would not lose, I promise.

Why are you signing your post as if I can't read your name???

I don't really know why I started doing that... it's just my thing I suppose. I think that those facts are interesting though and are important to recognize. It's difficult to weed out the shit heads from the people who are truly trying to leave their country for legitimate reasons.

-dankmau5

It's better to be safe than sorry. That's why in my opinion the EU never should've began accepting migrants in the first place.

[Wildfire]

I had a picture of the crime rates in Germany and the percentage of those crimes committed by migrants but I think I either deleted it or just can't find it, also, facts don't care about your feelings. Numbers don't lie and they prove that the majority of migrants are criminals. Here's a wikipedia page that I have bookmarked. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigratio...me#Germany I made it go straight to Germany because they're the country in the EU that's taking in the most migrants. Obviously humans should have the right to leave war-torn countries, but what IS NOT okay is when those people go and tear up their foster countries and re-create what they're apparently running from. Furthermore, it is ignorant to think that only people who legitimately want to escape their country are the only ones migrating. If this were true you wouldn't see videos of Muslims literally saying they're using the immigration crisis as a gateway to Europe in order to shove Islam down the throat of the west. These people are not humans who actually want a home and a nice place to live, these people are a disease that destroy everything they touch and need to be stopped. If they're not stopped, my prediction may become true, but that's only if the political elite decide to ignore Brexit. There's no doubt that Brexit will create a domino effect on countries leaving the EU, which will ultimately force migrants to stay in their home countries and get killed instead of going to other countries and dragging them down with them. A few countries worth of people dead is better than the entire world being ruled by Muslims and shit. As for your statement about not jumping into wars, that is just ignorance. Allies exist for a reason, some countries need allies so they can actually be protected (small and/or poor countries) and some countries just want allies so that they can have more unnecessary power, which is the only kind of "allyship" I disagree with. Also, some allies exist due to historical connections, such as the US and France. By the way, the US will never be fucked over if you're speaking in terms of war. Never. Before you say Vietnam, that was an anomaly due to the foreign lands and jungles they were fighting on. If that were to happen again the US would not lose, I promise.

Why are you signing your post as if I can't read your name???

I don't really know why I started doing that... it's just my thing I suppose. I think that those facts are interesting though and are important to recognize. It's difficult to weed out the shit heads from the people who are truly trying to leave their country for legitimate reasons.

-dankmau5

It's better to be safe than sorry. That's why in my opinion the EU never should've began accepting migrants in the first place.

Or at the least, only took in a few and heavily screened them for not only disease and bad intentions but sheer intelligence and the self control to not try to destroy the country of the people trying to make sure you are safe.

[Jiggly]

It's nice to see so many engaged in (somewhat) respectful and informed debate. I believe this news will be an important precursor to whatever the future might hold. It's an important point in our history and whether or not it is deemed as a good or bad event has yet to be determined/witnessed.

I predict it will be a good thing. Before the vote was over I made these predictions:

If the UK leaves the EU - This will compel other countries to leave that are being majority affected by this migrant crisis, ultimately sealing the deal for the cancerous and destructive migrants. The German prime minister (the one responsible for almost all of the migrant shit happening in Europe) will be either impeached or someone else will get elected (this is already happening). This will push the migrants back into the middle-east and Africa where they can fuck up their own countries instead of fucking up others, and ultimately kill each other and themselves. Yay!

If the UK remains in the EU - In x years, migrants force themselves into every country of the EU, eventually turning the countries into shitholes (this is currently happening with Germany and Sweden). After x or xx years, another migrant crisis begins due to the countries they turned to shit, and migrants begin pushing their way into Asia, ultimately turning those countries into shitholes as well. After x or xx years once again, either 1. the migrants decide to forcefully take over the Americas or 2. another migrant crisis will happen and they will eventually take over the Americas. At that point, the entire world will be doomed.

If my predictions were correct, then the whole world was just saved by Britian leaving the EU. Thank fuck for that.

I definitely see your point here but the important thing to remember is that a group of people is not defined by individuals. I'm not sure on the statistic of crime in immigrant population or if migration has any effect on said rates but I have a feeling that a majority of immigrants are not violent, nor are they criminals. I think that we should be a lot more strict on who we are letting in. This is especially true for countries who have serious issues as it is and for immigrants from regions that are already causing problems or are threatening the host country. Immigrants should have a use in the society if and only if the host country needs it. Countries should be able to opt out of immigration altogether if a vote is created but pro-immigration attitudes should be encouraged All people, in my opinion, deserve to have a place to escape to if their country is in a "bad place" so to speak. Specifically if their country is being violent, suppressive, manipulative, etc. I'm a firm believer in providing aid to those who need it but I will not condone forcing it down peoples throat. I do not believe we should be in other countries fighting wars for people. I do not believe we should be in other countries forcing our own ways onto people. I do believe that we should be there for others if they choose to ask for help but we shall not intervene directly. Should some power threaten us, then I believe we have the right to engage, outside of that is asking for trouble. Yeah you can argue that we should be proactive but that is a temptation that spirals out of control quickly. The US moved swiftly from defensive to offensive-defense. It's naive and will end up fucking us over in the future.

As my 1st grade teacher always used to say,
"Nose nose, where it goes."

-DarkMuse

Currently I believe they're trying to improve the bad hatred towards immigrants. Since immigrants actually patched up the holes in our manufacturing industries, they actually helped to boost out economy.

A lot of people like to talk about British pride, but I think they forget that Britain is made up of a lot of things that aren't British. People complain about foreign trucks taking up the roads but they'll go buy a Japanese made TV. Some people just need a bit more education.

---

I predict it will be a good thing. Before the vote was over I made these predictions:

If the UK leaves the EU - This will compel other countries to leave that are being majority affected by this migrant crisis, ultimately sealing the deal for the cancerous and destructive migrants. The German prime minister (the one responsible for almost all of the migrant shit happening in Europe) will be either impeached or someone else will get elected (this is already happening). This will push the migrants back into the middle-east and Africa where they can fuck up their own countries instead of fucking up others, and ultimately kill each other and themselves. Yay!

If the UK remains in the EU - In x years, migrants force themselves into every country of the EU, eventually turning the countries into shitholes (this is currently happening with Germany and Sweden). After x or xx years, another migrant crisis begins due to the countries they turned to shit, and migrants begin pushing their way into Asia, ultimately turning those countries into shitholes as well. After x or xx years once again, either 1. the migrants decide to forcefully take over the Americas or 2. another migrant crisis will happen and they will eventually take over the Americas. At that point, the entire world will be doomed.

If my predictions were correct, then the whole world was just saved by Britian leaving the EU. Thank fuck for that.

I definitely see your point here but the important thing to remember is that a group of people is not defined by individuals. I'm not sure on the statistic of crime in immigrant population or if migration has any effect on said rates but I have a feeling that a majority of immigrants are not violent, nor are they criminals. I think that we should be a lot more strict on who we are letting in. This is especially true for countries who have serious issues as it is and for immigrants from regions  that are already causing problems or are threatening the host country. Immigrants should have a use in the society if and only if the host country needs it. Countries should be able to opt out of immigration altogether if a vote is created but pro-immigration attitudes should be encouraged All people, in my opinion,  deserve to have a place to escape to if their country is in a "bad place" so to speak. Specifically if their country is being violent, suppressive, manipulative, etc. I'm a firm believer in providing aid to those who need it but I will not condone forcing it down peoples throat. I do not believe we should be in other countries fighting wars for people. I do not believe we should be in other countries forcing our own ways onto people. I do believe that we should be there for others if they choose to ask for help but we shall not intervene directly.  Should some power threaten us, then I believe we have the right to  engage, outside of that is asking for trouble. Yeah you can argue that we should be proactive but that is a temptation that spirals out of control quickly. The US moved swiftly from defensive to offensive-defense. It's naive and will end up fucking us over in the future.

As my 1st grade teacher always used to say,
"Nose nose, where it goes."

-DarkMuse

I had a picture of the crime rates in Germany and the percentage of those crimes committed by migrants but I think I either deleted it or just can't find it, also, facts don't care about your feelings. Numbers don't lie and they prove that the majority of migrants are criminals. Here's a wikipedia page that I have bookmarked. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigratio...me#Germany I made it go straight to Germany because they're the country in the EU that's taking in the most migrants. Obviously humans should have the right to leave war-torn countries, but what IS NOT okay is when those people go and tear up their foster countries and re-create what they're apparently running from. Furthermore, it is ignorant to think that only people who legitimately want to escape their country are the only ones migrating. If this were true you wouldn't see videos of Muslims literally saying they're using the immigration crisis as a gateway to Europe in order to shove Islam down the throat of the west. These people are not humans who actually want a home and a nice place to live, these people are a disease that destroy everything they touch and need to be stopped. If they're not stopped, my prediction may become true, but that's only if the political elite decide to ignore Brexit. There's no doubt that Brexit will create a domino effect on countries leaving the EU, which will ultimately force migrants to stay in their home countries and get killed instead of going to other countries and dragging them down with them. A few countries worth of people dead is better than the entire world being ruled by Muslims and shit. As for your statement about not jumping into wars, that is just ignorance. Allies exist for a reason, some countries need allies so they can actually be protected (small and/or poor countries) and some countries just want allies so that they can have more unnecessary power, which is the only kind of "allyship" I disagree with. Also, some allies exist due to historical connections, such as the US and France. By the way, the US will never be fucked over if you're speaking in terms of war. Never. Before you say Vietnam, that was an anomaly due to the foreign lands and jungles they were fighting on. If that were to happen again the US would not lose, I promise.

Why are you signing your post as if I can't read your name???

You guys are forgetting that the UK is not part of the Shengen agreement.

[Despised]

You know you guys can space your sentences to form paragraphs, right?

Wall of text is nice to the eyes though.