This reminds me of a video of how someone explains how the NSA hacked people’s emails here:
It was done by simple mathematical rudiments, or to be more specific, the
Elliptic Curve Cryptography.
Now, whether or not the act is truly unconstitutional is really a matter of disposition and weighing the circumstances. This reminds me of television series like Nikita where there’s always someone somewhere that has high-level access to nearly every region in the world. Usually it’s justified because it’s for the sake of national and worldwide security, but most of the time that’s catered towards nationalism and not facing with the reality of situations such as this.
Some may subscribe to the argument that as long as the individual isn’t up to anything suspicious that would throw up several red flags, that it shouldn’t be a big issue. Others would subscribe to the position that under no circumstances can this be allowed because of things like unalienable rights, natural rights, and things of that nature.
To me, whatever opinion we attach ourselves to, they’ll be doing things like this either way. Not to sound like a defeatist, because I feel that in some cases that this level of breach into other people’s privacy is clearly up for serious debate. And honestly, compared to things in other regions of the world where censorship and governmental control are at their highest, things like this would be a standard over areas like China (who coincidentally lifted a decade long ban on video games recently).
Should this ever be deemed as unconstitutional, it may end up being a slap on the wrist instead of a crueler punishment.