[scoobyeo]

If that's the case, then the following Is totally misleading and Irrelevant.

One particular FTID method that has the best chance of a successful outcome, Is to show the tracking number as delivered (carrier-wise), but the company has no record of the package- physically and In their administrative/office department.

That would be option 2 displayed in the Ebook which is what im referring to. option 3 is the same thing but you just change shipping address so its not delivered to their office so there is absolutely no trace, but I have seen some people on the forum running into trouble so im thinking option 2 (The method you described above) is the best bet? I think there's a lot of confusion because in the ebook that has been leaked he calls the method you just described FTID option 2. Even though its technically not FTID so that's why im referring that method as FTID

Not sure about Target, but as a point of reference, modifying shipping address is very high risk. If they open an investigation it'll fail right away. Also, if it does get delivered properly, it'll raise suspicion.

What if you do the normal method without modifying it to look as junk still high risk? If so what method do you think pro refunders use for target or best method in your opinion?