![]() |
|
Watch SE - Printable Version +- Sinisterly (https://sinister.li) +-- Forum: Hacking (https://sinister.li/Forum-Hacking) +--- Forum: Social Engineering (https://sinister.li/Forum-Social-Engineering) +--- Thread: Watch SE (/Thread-Watch-SE--160097) |
RE: Watch SE - razmataz - 03-09-2023 (03-09-2023, 05:22 PM)WLT17 Wrote: Yeah i didn't do mine with goldsmiths, i thought i specified that previously, completely forgot that this was related to goldsmiths. Sorry. where did you order from? RE: Watch SE - AVE - 03-09-2023 (03-09-2023, 09:28 AM)Rare Justice Emperor Wrote:True, well at least we know goldsmiths have CCTV now. Ill just legit return.(03-08-2023, 09:42 PM)Brav4 Wrote:Remember that he didn't mention how he preformed his WIR , process of the claim was extremely easy for him because of the kind of "WIR" method he preformed in action . maybe he bought a high exact copy of the same watch and made a complain thus it was approved ! maybe the department which sent the order was simply completely different from yours and didn't contain functional cctvs . "_its not simply preforming the method in hope to reach a similar outcome like a fellow SE'r..._"(03-03-2023, 01:41 PM)WLT17 Wrote: Nope it was extremely easy considering the amount to be honest with you. I have only been asked for the packaging slip a few times with this method and i just send the one from my own order.I ORDERED AND THEY DID A INVESTIGATION AND HAD CCTV CAMERA THAT CONFIRMED IT WAS PACKED PROPERLY . 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬 i claimed that i recieved a whole another watch box and watch. Also they sent a free gift of a speaker which might of messed up things. Order was 2k RE: Watch SE - Bede - 03-17-2023 (03-09-2023, 05:22 PM)WLT17 Wrote: Yeah i didn't do mine with goldsmiths, i thought i specified that previously, completely forgot that this was related to goldsmiths. Sorry.Could you please tell us where you ordered from. |