![]() |
|
Truth about FTID - Printable Version +- Sinisterly (https://sinister.li) +-- Forum: Hacking (https://sinister.li/Forum-Hacking) +--- Forum: Social Engineering (https://sinister.li/Forum-Social-Engineering) +--- Thread: Truth about FTID (/Thread-Truth-about-FTID) Pages:
1
2
|
RE: Truth about FTID - vasyleus - 10-09-2022 (10-09-2022, 01:33 AM)mothered Wrote:(10-08-2022, 05:38 PM)vasyleus Wrote:I've made my points crystal clear.(10-08-2022, 03:44 PM)mothered Wrote: That's a different story altogether. Yes, i red them. Also I tried to get some more info from the people who works at, for example, UPS. Pretending I am frustrated customer and it looks like they know how these things happen and why some label editing might actually work. They are afraid to talk about it "because explaining how it works is mainly useful for scammers". Hence we might guess that the manual label editing is not as meaningless as we might thought. So I think that those, who can pull those refunds using FTID, they understand the principle of the label and how the courier company operates better. RE: Truth about FTID - mothered - 10-09-2022 (10-09-2022, 09:11 AM)vasyleus Wrote: Yes, i red them. Also I tried to get some more info from the people who works at, for example, UPS. Pretending I am frustrated customer and it looks like they know how these things happen and why some label editing might actually work. They are afraid to talk about it "because explaining how it works is mainly useful for scammers". Hence we might guess that the manual label editing is not as meaningless as we might thought. So I think that those, who can pull those refunds using FTID, they understand the principle of the label and how the courier company operates better.I understand what you're saying and I'm not disagreeing with the method's application, but rather Its Inconsistencies that Inevitably lead to failure a lot more often than not. Sure, It does work (I've stated It In my blog), but Its success Is based on the laziness, stupidity, Incompetency and Incapacity of those handling the shipment to process It accordingly. All In all, It's not the effectiveness of the so-called FTID that's responsible for a favourable outcome - It's the mismanagement of carrier drivers, Inwards goods personnel and representatives that allow It to succeed. That's why It's not classed as a method - It cannot get the job done on Its own, It needs brain-dead Individuals to make It happen. RE: Truth about FTID - nonerex - 10-09-2022 (10-08-2022, 06:13 AM)ImprovingLizard Wrote:How do you edit the qr code? Could I still use that guide and edit the qr code too?(10-08-2022, 12:48 AM)nonerex Wrote:(10-07-2022, 10:47 PM)ImprovingLizard Wrote: Each company is different in how they operate. And as such different methods need to be used for FTID. For me it has a high success rate, about 90% I'd say. Done around £30ks worth this year. Mainly designer clothes and Google.Would you say this FTID method will work or is it too simple? RE: Truth about FTID - ImprovingLizard - 10-10-2022 (10-08-2022, 12:41 PM)vasyleus Wrote:(10-08-2022, 10:18 AM)mothered Wrote:(10-08-2022, 07:03 AM)vasyleus Wrote: but the main question is "why delivery guy should deliver the package/envelope with a pre-made label based on what is written on the label instead of what the system and scans state?"^ Nailed It. What do you mean, how would I explain it? In most cases as long as you get delivered status on the ftid it's enough providing it's a prepaid label from the company themselves. Ive very rarely ever had them say they've not received the parcel even though I know they haven't. And even if they do if they are liable they will refund you anyway. It's just important to research on which companies/couriers it works for really. Its not a foolproof method that will work on any store. But it is the best method if you doing a high volume of refunds and hitting the same stores. You don't want to keep doing DNA and such to your own address. |