[Erythro]

Hello, I was wondering if anyone has an empty 200ml frarance bottle of Dior Sauvage.  I'd be willing to pay for a picture of a cracked dior sauvage bottle in a box with some water to make it look like the perfume spilled. I know it's a long shot but figured someone out there might have it haha.

[mothered]

If you have no luck In obtaining Images, alternatively, you can use the wrong Item received method or box them.

The nature of the Item Is suited to both methods.

[Erythro]

If you have no luck In obtaining Images, alternatively, you can use the wrong Item received method or box them.

The nature of the Item Is suited to both methods.

I've never tried the box method as it seems risky to me. As far as I know, the box method basically means sending back an empty box that's slightly damaged to make it seem like it was stolen during transit.

But doesn't that escalate the situation to theft? Even if the company doesn't suspect I'm behind it, they might ask me more questions or maybe accuse the courier of stealing the package (I try to be as moral as I can when SE'ing so I avoid putting regular workers into trouble). Box method appears to be very popular but it's always seemed risky to me. Perhaps I'm overthinking it? I'm thinking of doing wrong item received. Thanks for your reply.

[mothered]

As far as I know, the box method basically means sending back an empty box that's slightly damaged to make it seem like it was stolen during transit.

Correct.

But doesn't that escalate the situation to theft?

When SEing for a refund/replacement, It's obtained on false grounds, hence every method Is considered theft. Go with whatever method you're comfortable with.

[Erythro]

Sorry for late reply, haven't been active.

When SEing for a refund/replacement, It's obtained on false grounds, hence every method Is considered theft. Go with whatever method you're comfortable with.

I understand what you're saying, but with other methods surely you have plausible deniability? For example if you go for missing items method - you can claim a family member took the items out without your knowledge hence why you thought items were missing. On the other hand, box method basically gives you no deniability to attempting the refund. That's why I saw it as more risky, or am I wrong?

[mothered]

I understand what you're saying, but with other methods surely you have plausible deniability? For example if you go for missing items method - you can claim a family member took the items out without your knowledge hence why you thought items were missing.

For example if you go for missing items method - you can claim a family member took the items out without your knowledge hence why you thought items were missing.

It should not have to come to this ^ point. It's an admission of guilt, which Is not good practice.

When SEing, the objective Is to succeed by way of manipulating and exploiting the human firewall. Remember- It's always their error, not yours.

[Erythro]

When SEing, the objective Is to succeed by way of manipulating and exploiting the human firewall. Remember- It's always their error, not yours.

That's a good point. Cheers for the help.

[DeltaOG]

Dior is easy just use DNA. ( -500€ )

[Erythro]

Dior is easy just use DNA. ( -500€ )

I'm from the UK. Can't say I know anyone who has done Dior (from their actual website). I'm guessing DNA is possible, but I avoid attempting refunds if I'm uncertain if it will be successful. I will research this though, cheers.

[mothered]

When SEing, the objective Is to succeed by way of manipulating and exploiting the human firewall. Remember- It's always their error, not yours.

That's a good point. Cheers for the help.

You're very welcome.