(04-09-2014, 08:24 PM)Satan Wrote: I don't understand how having a month dedicated to the history of an ethnic group that has for the most part done more for human rights and withstood oppression than most ethnic groups have is special treatment. Rather I see it as celebrating accomplishment and history of the ethnic group, and making future generations educated on what they went through so that history does not repeat itself by ignorance.
Well more often than not, history will repeat itself, regardless of teaching.
It's not so much as knowledge as it is human nature.
Also, saying that they have withstood oppression more than most ethnic groups does not really validate why any of the other ethnic groups would not deserve such a treatment or event. ( IE: Sure, someone who got shot twice has it worse than the person who was shot once, but they were still both shot ).
Slavery was not limited to Africans, believe it or not, it simply comes down to actual fame.
We are most familiar and it's nearer to our time that we can acknowledge the African Slavery and past issues, not to mention that was
past Africans.
Many a time it has been seen that African-Americans complain of racism or history of their people, even though they personally suffered nothing of the sort, and should not be coupled, or celebrated, with that history.
It's something we teach in schools, and that should be the limit, not something that should be truly celebrated. I fail to see the Women's History Month, as they have been through heavy oppression as well, or downright Foreign History Month, or Japanese History Month, seeing as they were under heavy speculation and abducted for unethical interrogation during WWII.
The whole concept is just plain silly and makes little to no sense when brought out in comparison to everything else.