Login Register




The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.


Samsung watch sn filter_list
Author
Message
Samsung watch sn #1
Hi guys just realised my galaxy active 2 watch is still under warranty and was wondering if S/N method would work and what should I say the issue with the watch is thanks.

Reply

RE: Samsung watch sn #2
Quote: just realised my galaxy active 2 watch is still under warranty and was wondering if S/N method would work
Why not send It back for a legit warranty claim and box the return?
[Image: AD83g1A.png]

Reply

RE: Samsung watch sn #3
(09-15-2022, 12:13 PM)mothered Wrote:
Quote: just realised my galaxy active 2 watch is still under warranty and was wondering if S/N method would work
Why not send It back for a legit warranty claim and box the return?

Maybe nothing wrong with it
So would warranty claim work or nah ?

Reply

RE: Samsung watch sn #4
(09-15-2022, 12:30 PM)mike oxlong Wrote:
(09-15-2022, 12:13 PM)mothered Wrote:
Quote: just realised my galaxy active 2 watch is still under warranty and was wondering if S/N method would work
Why not send It back for a legit warranty claim and box the return?

Maybe nothing wrong with it
So would warranty claim work or nah ?
Say that It's faulty and when they request the return, box them.
[Image: AD83g1A.png]

Reply

RE: Samsung watch sn #5
(09-15-2022, 12:54 PM)mothered Wrote:
(09-15-2022, 12:30 PM)mike oxlong Wrote:
(09-15-2022, 12:13 PM)mothered Wrote: Why not send It back for a legit warranty claim and box the return?

Maybe nothing wrong with it
So would warranty claim work or nah ?
Say that It's faulty and when they request the return, box them.
Alright will try it out

Reply

RE: Samsung watch sn #6
(09-15-2022, 12:54 PM)mothered Wrote:
(09-15-2022, 12:30 PM)mike oxlong Wrote:
(09-15-2022, 12:13 PM)mothered Wrote: Why not send It back for a legit warranty claim and box the return?

Maybe nothing wrong with it
So would warranty claim work or nah ?
Say that It's faulty and when they request the return, box them.

Was gna say that but I was questioning would lit worker better or just FTID them normally?

Reply

RE: Samsung watch sn #7
(09-15-2022, 01:20 PM)mike oxlong Wrote:
(09-15-2022, 12:54 PM)mothered Wrote:
(09-15-2022, 12:30 PM)mike oxlong Wrote: Maybe nothing wrong with it
So would warranty claim work or nah ?
Say that It's faulty and when they request the return, box them.

Was gna say that but I was questioning would lit worker better or just FTID them normally?
Don’t use ftid it is unreliable

Reply

RE: Samsung watch sn #8
(09-15-2022, 01:24 PM)monkey123. Wrote:
(09-15-2022, 01:20 PM)mike oxlong Wrote:
(09-15-2022, 12:54 PM)mothered Wrote: Say that It's faulty and when they request the return, box them.

Was gna say that but I was questioning would lit worker better or just FTID them normally?
Don’t use ftid it is unreliable
So what are you going to use ?

Reply

RE: Samsung watch sn #9
(09-15-2022, 01:30 PM)mike oxlong Wrote:
(09-15-2022, 01:24 PM)monkey123. Wrote:
(09-15-2022, 01:20 PM)mike oxlong Wrote: Was gna say that but I was questioning would lit worker better or just FTID them normally?
Don’t use ftid it is unreliable
So what are you going to use ?
Just gonna box it

Reply

RE: Samsung watch sn #10
(09-15-2022, 01:20 PM)mike oxlong Wrote: Was gna say that but I was questioning would lit worker better or just FTID them normally?
Use a method that has a proven track record of success - In this case, boxing.
[Image: AD83g1A.png]

Reply