[ephermeral123]

I ordered a nanoleaf hexagon LED light kit valued at $220 CAD and weighing 2.42 kg from amazon.ca (link below). I was originally planning to use the DNA method but the carrier took a photo of my front door with the delivery. Unfortunately, the front door is quite easily identifiable and not something I can easily change. I do not have access to dry ice and was wondering what other options I can consider.

amazon.ca/gp/product/B08N62R79Z/ref=ppx_od_dt_b_asin_title_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1

Thanks for you guys help!

[mothered]

I was originally planning to use the DNA method but the carrier took a photo of my front door with the delivery.

Was the package purely dumped at the front door?

[ephermeral123]

I was originally planning to use the DNA method but the carrier took a photo of my front door with the delivery.

Was the package purely dumped at the front door?

Yes, they just left it at the front and took a photo of the door with the package

[mothered]

Yes, they just left it at the front and took a photo of the door with the package

Good, you can DNA It.

They can take 100 photos of every angle - It doesn't change the fact that the package was left unattended at your doorstep, hence "you did not personally receive It".

[ephermeral123]

Yes, they just left it at the front and took a photo of the door with the package

Good, you can DNA It.

They can take 100 photos of every angle - It doesn't change the fact that the package was left unattended at your doorstep, hence "you did not personally receive It".

Thanks for your help. Successfully SE'd with an incident report.

[Jay875]

I succeeded one of these by telling them that was not my doorstep in the photo but someone else's house.

[mothered]

Yes, they just left it at the front and took a photo of the door with the package

Good, you can DNA It.

They can take 100 photos of every angle - It doesn't change the fact that the package was left unattended at your doorstep, hence "you did not personally receive It".

Thanks for your help. Successfully SE'd with an incident report.

You're most welcome. I was very confident of Its success.

It clearly demonstrates (and backs my comments), that photographic evidence Is useless under the circumstances of the events described.