[darkninja1980]

Kali is the best linux for hacking.

[mothered]

Kali is the best linux for hacking.

The "user" Is the hacker, not the OS nor It's tools.

[darkninja1980]

Kali is the best linux for hacking.

The "user" Is the hacker, not the OS nor It's tools.

right but I was mention Kali is the best to use when hacking.

[mothered]

Kali is the best linux for hacking.

The "user" Is the hacker, not the OS nor It's tools.

right but I was mention Kali is the best to use when hacking.

I understand, and do agree that Kali Linux has some very beneficial tools In Identifying & exploiting vulnerabilities.

My post was more so based on the fact of "The tools don't make the hacker". "The hacker makes the tools".

[darkninja1980]

The "user" Is the hacker, not the OS nor It's tools.

right but I was mention Kali is the best to use when hacking.

I understand, and do agree that Kali Linux has some very beneficial tools In Identifying & exploiting vulnerabilities.

My post was more so based on the fact of "The tools don't make the hacker". "The hacker makes the tools".

yes I understand what you mean by it.

[Kludge]

The "user" Is the hacker, not the OS nor It's tools.

right but I was mention Kali is the best to use when hacking.

I understand, and do agree that Kali Linux has some very beneficial tools In Identifying & exploiting vulnerabilities.

My post was more so based on the fact of "The tools don't make the hacker". "The hacker makes the tools".

Hackers do make the tools, but the tools teach the novices. I prefer Parrot. Harder to master, but more robust and less used, so less trackable.

[darkninja1980]

right but I was mention Kali is the best to use when hacking.

I understand, and do agree that Kali Linux has some very beneficial tools In Identifying & exploiting vulnerabilities.

My post was more so based on the fact of "The tools don't make the hacker". "The hacker makes the tools".

Hackers do make the tools, but the tools teach the novices. I prefer Parrot. Harder to master, but more robust and less used, so less trackable.

about black arch?

[Kludge]

I understand, and do agree that Kali Linux has some very beneficial tools In Identifying & exploiting vulnerabilities.

My post was more so based on the fact of "The tools don't make the hacker". "The hacker makes the tools".

Hackers do make the tools, but the tools teach the novices. I prefer Parrot. Harder to master, but more robust and less used, so less trackable.

about black arch?

Black Arch is pointless. If you're using Arch you should be building a custom OS almost from scratch. BA goes against the values of Arch's mission, which is, of course, building your own OS. It does you no good to learn about Linux using Arch if you're provided with tools and a GUI right out of the package.
If you want to use Arch to hack something, build a custom system from straight Arch and install only the custom tools you want on it. You don't even need the GUI if you build from a blank install. This means it would run faster because your system is not having to run a graphical interface.

[darkninja1980]

Hackers do make the tools, but the tools teach the novices. I prefer Parrot. Harder to master, but more robust and less used, so less trackable.

about black arch?

Black Arch is pointless. If you're using Arch you should be building a custom OS almost from scratch. BA goes against the values of Arch's mission, which is, of course, building your own OS. It does you no good to learn about Linux using Arch if you're provided with tools and a GUI right out of the package.
If you want to use Arch to hack something, build a custom system from straight Arch and install only the custom tools you want on it. You don't even need the GUI if you build from a blank install. This means it would run faster because your system is not having to run a graphical interface.

that is very true. But black arch does say they have over 2,100 hacking tools on the OS.

[Kludge]

about black arch?

Black Arch is pointless. If you're using Arch you should be building a custom OS almost from scratch. BA goes against the values of Arch's mission, which is, of course, building your own OS. It does you no good to learn about Linux using Arch if you're provided with tools and a GUI right out of the package.
If you want to use Arch to hack something, build a custom system from straight Arch and install only the custom tools you want on it. You don't even need the GUI if you build from a blank install. This means it would run faster because your system is not having to run a graphical interface.

that is very true. But black arch does say they have over 2,100 hacking tools on the OS.

Yeah, but are you really going to use 2100 tools? I find that the packages in Kali and Parrot are more than enough to hack, crack, and even use for legit purposes. Plus, download the package information and then just download the entirety of the BA hacking tools pack.
It isn't hard to add packages to different distros. Arch, if you're using nothing but the command line, can streamline your entire system as well as giving you access to the tools. The 2100 tools should already be ready to download with pacman.