[KoryKANE]

Recent as in 2 months ago.

Then It's okay to perform another SE.

I was thinking of DNAing or saying it arrived with the box tampered with.

The DNA Is fine.

In terms of the box being tampered with, the objective Is for the Item to be stolen In transit, so It must be light enough to not register a weight on consignment.

I was also thinking of trying sth else though. So one person orders a lower cost item and the other a high value one simultaneously. They must be from the same manufactorer and have a similar name however. Now the guy who ordered the more expensive item claims he got the cheaper version while the other says nothing. I heard that this method often works since internally they know that one expensive item was shipping at a similar time but maybe just to the wrong person.
Human error could play into this SE.

Are you planning to do It yourself on two separate accounts, and then claim (on one account) that you received the cheap Item Instead of the high value Item?

If so, It's no different to the wrong Item received method.

What do you think is best for a larger item which wouldnt work with the missing item method.

The missing Item method Is weight-specific, hence the dimensions are Irrelevant.

An mpc is about the size and weight of a laptop, give or take.

There are many methods available - wrong Item received, sealed box, obviously the DNA, disposed of the faulty Item etc.

Thanks a bunch, brother. Sorry for replying so late, life caught up with me.
Just a question: I want to do this with a quite expensive but rather small item (1,2k euros)
Would DNA work or would it be wiser to SE an item below 1k instead to avoid having to do a PR?
I heard it's becoming standard having to go thru a pr in europe, regardless of purchase history if the item exceeds a certain amount.

Does anyone know?