Nunes Memo Released! 02-02-2018, 08:54 PM
#1
Please, before you continue reading any part of this thread, read the official document (from house.gov).
http://docs.house.gov/meetings/IG/IG00/2...-SD001.pdf
My opinions on the memo
Let me know your opinions, this is most certainly open for debate.
EDIT: here is the full transcript for that meeting
EDIT 2: here is what CNN has to say (for an opposing viewpoint)
EDIT 3: here is what TheDailyWire has to say (confirming viewpoint)
http://docs.house.gov/meetings/IG/IG00/2...-SD001.pdf
My opinions on the memo
Spoiler:
So, I'm excited to watch all these CNN reporters eat their words. Over the last couple days everybody had said it was material evidence of trump/russia, but it turns out it's got a much stronger correlation to [fbi/doj/fgps]/clinton.
The document is basically an apology for wiretaps targeting the Trump campaign (indirectly), because their source was materially tied to the dossier. In the memo they detail why their source should not have been considered a reliable source, and then at the very end of the document they say had they taken that one fact into account before hand, they could have never issued the FISA warrants.
The interesting points are where they line out the names of people who gave the authorizations (there were many), among them are Comey and McCabe. It seems that these people knew about the conflicts of interest in the source, as well as the far more important piece of information, the source and his lover's "insurance policy" against a Trump presidency.
The document is basically an apology for wiretaps targeting the Trump campaign (indirectly), because their source was materially tied to the dossier. In the memo they detail why their source should not have been considered a reliable source, and then at the very end of the document they say had they taken that one fact into account before hand, they could have never issued the FISA warrants.
The interesting points are where they line out the names of people who gave the authorizations (there were many), among them are Comey and McCabe. It seems that these people knew about the conflicts of interest in the source, as well as the far more important piece of information, the source and his lover's "insurance policy" against a Trump presidency.
Let me know your opinions, this is most certainly open for debate.
EDIT: here is the full transcript for that meeting
EDIT 2: here is what CNN has to say (for an opposing viewpoint)
EDIT 3: here is what TheDailyWire has to say (confirming viewpoint)
(This post was last modified: 02-02-2018, 09:17 PM by phyrrus9.)



























![[+]](https://sinister.li/images/modern/collapse_collapsed.png)





![[Image: 7ajmN5P.jpg]](https://i.imgur.com/7ajmN5P.jpg)







![[Image: qcYJ3l.png]](https://i.skull.moe/u/qcYJ3l.png)
![[Image: inkexplosion.jpg]](http://i0.wp.com/techverse.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/inkexplosion.jpg)