[Eclipse]

I hope you kill yourself for blatantly stating all religion is bullshit. It's like claiming you know everything.

This will not help your argument at all. Very immature, worse than the original statement.

I agree. Look how I did it. ^

[Guardian]

I hope you kill yourself for blatantly stating all religion is bullshit. It's like claiming you know everything.

This will not help your argument at all. Very immature, worse than the original statement.

I agree. Look how I did it. ^

Yes, I see that. :thumb-up: While I disagree, it would be much easier to engage in intellectual dialogue with you. Kudos. That's all anyone can ask for really.

[Harvey]

Actually Jesus has been proven to exist, again do your research. What was not proven is that he was the son of God

I'd love to see this proof. I also agree that it would be more logical to worship the sun rather than a god.

Jesus of Nazareth was actually real, look it up do your research and I expected more from you Harvey, your philosophy tells you to do not wait for others to do it for you.

I can't accept claims from dead priests thousands of years ago. I can't accept writings from Christian priests. I certainly won't accept anything from the bible. I want solid evidence.

Evidence for the historical existence of Jesus of Nazareth (the Christ) as portrayed in the Bible is only found in three places: the Bible itself, other early Christian writings, and references by the various early churches (c. 100 CE) to the long dead leader of those churches.

Nope, nope, and nope.

[Nil]

Jesus has been referenced in writings by non-biblical figures. Majority of credible historians agree that Jesus did in in fact exist. And from here people will argue whether his "powers" are legitimate.

[Harvey]

Jesus has been referenced in writings by non-biblical figures. Majority of credible historians agree that Jesus did in in fact exist. And from here people will argue whether his "powers" are legitimate.

Suppose he did exist, and that there is valid evidence to suggest this is the case. Is there any evidence to suggest he's not just the average bloke?

[Evangelist]

Jesus has been referenced in writings by non-biblical figures. Majority of credible historians agree that Jesus did in in fact exist. And from here people will argue whether his "powers" are legitimate.

Suppose he did exist, and that there is valid evidence to suggest this is the case. Is there any evidence to suggest he's not just the average bloke?

He was a normal dude. Nothing special from him.

[Harvey]

Jesus has been referenced in writings by non-biblical figures. Majority of credible historians agree that Jesus did in in fact exist. And from here people will argue whether his "powers" are legitimate.

Suppose he did exist, and that there is valid evidence to suggest this is the case. Is there any evidence to suggest he's not just the average bloke?

He was a normal dude. Nothing special from him.

Then what makes him the son of god and not me?

[Guardian]

I do remember reading ABOUT Roman records about Jesus the MAN. I for one do not doubt he existed. He most likely did. Just because he did exist doesn't make him a Messiah. For one he was born Jewish and he didn't even meet the Jewish criteria for being the Messiah that was 'passed down from God' so he was just another cult leader in my eyes.