[Oni]

New York is trying to introduce a price ceiling for broadband internet and the ISPs are suing. Typically when pricing is set below the equilibrium, it causes a shortage. Especially when service providers are not in agreement.

Internet service providers today sued New York to block a state law that requires ISPs to sell $15-per-month broadband plans to low-income households.

The lawsuit was filed by lobby groups including USTelecom and CTIA–The Wireless Association, both of which count Verizon and AT&T among their members. Lobby groups for many other ISPs also joined the lawsuit, with plaintiffs including NTCA–The Rural Broadband Association, the Satellite Broadcasting & Communications Association, and the New York State Telecommunications Association. The biggest cable lobby group, NCTA, did not join the lawsuit, but a cable lobby group representing small providers—America's Communications Association—is one of the plaintiffs suing New York.

New York enacted its cheap-broadband law two weeks ago and called it a "first-in-the-nation requirement for affordable Internet for qualifying low-income families."

With this law, New York "seeks to regulate broadband rates," the ISPs' complaint said. "A provision of the recently enacted New York State Fiscal Year 2022 Budget requires wireline, fixed wireless, and satellite broadband providers—no later than June 15, 2021—to begin offering to qualifying low-income consumers high-speed broadband service at a cost to consumers of $15 per month or higher-speed broadband service at a cost to consumers of $20 per month." ISPs claim the state requirement is preempted by federal law.

Read More: https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2021...or-people/

[Jiggly]

Was this aimed to get more/better internet for low-income families? I feel like there could be a better solution than these restrictions if so.

[mothered]

Internet service providers today sued New York to block a state law that requires ISPs to sell $15-per-month broadband plans to low-income households.

I actually agree with New York on this.

In my locality, people are Income tested and those who fall as low-Income earners, are given ex-amount of dollars off their bills and other related utilities. I don't see how and why ISPs should be excluded.