RE: MitM conceptual question 01-06-2014, 12:35 PM
#11
This is the correct answer ^
| MitM conceptual question filter_list | |
(01-06-2014, 10:36 AM)Geoff Wrote:(01-06-2014, 08:17 AM)hunt3r972 Wrote: If he wants to sniff the network so yes he will need the WPA/WPA2 key, you're right.
If he wants to do an MITM attack he will also need the WPA/WPA2 key to connect to it to do his MITM attack, you're right too.
The thing that made me think he is confusing about MITM and Evil Twin is that he wants to create a fake AP with the same ESSID that will allow him to sniff the victime
You can do an "Evil Twin" AP and MITM attack in the same "hack". The two are not mutually exclusive.
MITM is a technique used on a network to get between the victim and his destination. How that victim connects to the network is irrelevant. If you deauth someone and youve got an Evil Twin with a stronger signal that they auto-connect to with no passphrase then you can perform a MITM.
the OP's confusion is about the evil twin... how the victim would connect if the fake AP had a passphrase... but in reality this is irrelevant. the device will often connect automatically to any network it can with a strong signal.
(01-21-2014, 09:46 PM)jimmyreese Wrote: So let's say I have a WPA2 network named "linkgear". Would it be possible for a cyber criminal to obtain my WPA2 key by creating an evil twin "linkgear" AP which uses WEP passphrase authentication instead of WPA2. Then persuade/force my client devices and their human operators to attempt to connect to the evil "linkgear" AP with the real "linkgear"s WPA2 key, thereby performing a caffe-latte attack? It would rely on a little user ignorance as they would have to type the WPA2 key but 95% of the population would think absolutely nothing of it.In this case the thing I would do gonna be: