RE: London's burning display 09-06-2016, 10:19 PM
#11
| London's burning display filter_list | |
RE: London's burning display 09-06-2016, 10:38 PM
#12
God dammit. I was less than two weeks early
It's often the outcasts, the iconoclasts ... those who have the least to lose because they
don't have much in the first place, who feel the new currents and ride them the farthest.
don't have much in the first place, who feel the new currents and ride them the farthest.
RE: London's burning display 09-07-2016, 02:14 AM
#14
(09-06-2016, 11:15 PM)Primitive Wrote:(09-06-2016, 10:38 PM)Ao- Wrote: God dammit. I was less than two weeks early
What does that mean?
Could've been there for it if my trip was later than it was
It's often the outcasts, the iconoclasts ... those who have the least to lose because they
don't have much in the first place, who feel the new currents and ride them the farthest.
don't have much in the first place, who feel the new currents and ride them the farthest.
RE: London's burning display 09-07-2016, 08:58 AM
#16
I didn't know about London's burning before, how sad
RE: London's burning display 09-07-2016, 06:00 PM
#19
(09-07-2016, 05:51 PM)Altair Wrote:u read the thread title lmao.(09-07-2016, 05:20 PM)Primitive Wrote:(09-07-2016, 08:58 AM)Altair Wrote: I didn't know about London's burning before, how sadYou didn't even read the thread.
I'm negging you for that.
I was already read the thread, what is wrong with that ?
RE: London's burning display 09-07-2016, 06:03 PM
#20
(09-07-2016, 06:00 PM)Primitive Wrote:yes, still what is the problem with that? I was talked about that fire( occured 350 years ago)(09-07-2016, 05:51 PM)Altair Wrote:u read the thread title lmao.(09-07-2016, 05:20 PM)Primitive Wrote: You didn't even read the thread.
I'm negging you for that.
I was already read the thread, what is wrong with that ?





![[+]](https://sinister.li/images/modern/collapse_collapsed.png)











