[wideputin]

I've been searching on this forum for a while now, and I haven't been able to find any tutorial on how to do the Lost In Transit method let alone any that have been proven to work. I've heard about using invisible ink but has anyone actually done it and can tell me it was successful? Any other LIT methods would be much appreciated.

[mothered]

First and foremost, who's the company you're planning to SE and what's the Item description?

[wideputin]

First and foremost, who's the company you're planning to SE and what's the Item description?

Amazon mainly but other retailers such as AO or Curry’s PC, John Lewis as well. Items I’m thinking of doing are Prebuilts, Computer parts, phones etc., and possibly expensive jewellery.

[mothered]

Amazon mainly but other retailers such as AO or Curry’s PC, John Lewis as well. Items I’m thinking of doing are Prebuilts, Computer parts, phones etc., and possibly expensive jewellery.

Given there's an array of suitable methods available, Is there a reason why you're opting for the LIT?

[ZhongwenGui]

@mothered wich store and technique do you suggest to SE Samsung S22 ultra?

[mothered]

@mothered wich store and technique do you suggest to SE Samsung S22 ultra?

At the time of this post, Apple Is predominantly not cross-checking weights with the EB/missing Item method.

Many members have succeeded SEing cell phones using the said method.

[wideputin]

Amazon mainly but other retailers such as AO or Curry’s PC, John Lewis as well. Items I’m thinking of doing are Prebuilts, Computer parts, phones etc., and possibly expensive jewellery.

Given there's an array of suitable methods available, Is there a reason why you're opting for the LIT?

LIT seems to be an easier and fool proof method compared to all the others. The chance of my refund request being rejected, especially with amazon considering they ban accounts when other methods are used, is next to nothing due to the fact that it’s the carrier’s fault every time. It just seems to be a low effort universal method to me. So is there a working LIT method or is there an easier universal way that outperforms it like you were suggesting?

[mothered]

LIT seems to be an easier and fool proof method compared to all the others.

How many times have you used It and succeeded?

The chance of my refund request being rejected, especially with amazon considering they ban accounts when other methods are used, is next to nothing due to the fact that it’s the carrier’s fault every time.

Account closures are due to SE'ers neglecting to refund with common sense and good judgement, and not a direct result of the method per se.

In terms of the LIT, It has an array of Inconsistences that ultimately exposes Its Intention more often than not.

So is there a working LIT method

As with the flawed so-called FTID, I don't support the LIT so I won't comment on It.

or is there an easier universal way that outperforms it like you were suggesting?

You haven't provided any details, so It's Impossible to generalize.

As said, who's the company you're planning to SE and what's the Item description?

[wideputin]

LIT seems to be an easier and fool proof method compared to all the others.

How many times have you used It and succeeded?

The chance of my refund request being rejected, especially with amazon considering they ban accounts when other methods are used, is next to nothing due to the fact that it’s the carrier’s fault every time.

Account closures are due to SE'ers neglecting to refund with common sense and good judgement, and not a direct result of the method per se.

In terms of the LIT, It has an array of Inconsistences that ultimately exposes Its Intention more often than not.

So is there a working LIT method

As with the so-called flawed FTID, I don't support the LIT so I won't comment on It.

or is there an easier universal way that outperforms it like you were suggesting?

You haven't provided any details, so It's Impossible to generalize.

As said, who's the company you're planning to SE and what's the Item description?

I think I’ve said this earlier, the companies are retailers like curry’s, AO, Amazon, John Lewis, and Apple. The items are electronics such as laptops, phones, and computer parts. Maybe even expensive jewellery.

[mothered]

I think I’ve said this earlier, the companies are retailers like curry’s, AO, Amazon, John Lewis, and Apple. The items are electronics such as laptops, phones, and computer parts. Maybe even expensive jewellery.

A given traditional method Is based on the nature of the Item, as well as the company's operations.

For Instance, you wouldn't use the wrong Item received method against John Lewis - their CCTV footage would deem the Item was picked, packed and dispatched correctly. Apple on the other hand, tend to release themselves from liability when claiming nonreceipt of goods, hence the DNA method Is out of the question. Amazon may require an OTP on delivery, which again puts an end to the DNA. Currys also has CCTV cameras In operation - no need to elaborate further.

Please name the company and Item, specifically.