Sinisterly
LIT Method help - Printable Version

+- Sinisterly (https://sinister.li)
+-- Forum: Hacking (https://sinister.li/Forum-Hacking)
+--- Forum: Social Engineering (https://sinister.li/Forum-Social-Engineering)
+--- Thread: LIT Method help (/Thread-LIT-Method-help)

Pages: 1 2

LIT Method help - wideputin - 06-09-2022

I've been searching on this forum for a while now, and I haven't been able to find any tutorial on how to do the Lost In Transit method let alone any that have been proven to work. I've heard about using invisible ink but has anyone actually done it and can tell me it was successful? Any other LIT methods would be much appreciated.

RE: LIT Method help - mothered - 06-10-2022

First and foremost, who's the company you're planning to SE and what's the Item description?

RE: LIT Method help - wideputin - 06-10-2022

(06-10-2022, 04:16 AM)mothered Wrote: First and foremost, who's the company you're planning to SE and what's the Item description?
Amazon mainly but other retailers such as AO or Curry’s PC, John Lewis as well. Items I’m thinking of doing are Prebuilts, Computer parts, phones etc., and possibly expensive jewellery.

RE: LIT Method help - mothered - 06-10-2022

(06-10-2022, 12:14 PM)wideputin Wrote: Amazon mainly but other retailers such as AO or Curry’s PC, John Lewis as well. Items I’m thinking of doing are Prebuilts, Computer parts, phones etc., and possibly expensive jewellery.
Given there's an array of suitable methods available, Is there a reason why you're opting for the LIT?

RE: LIT Method help - ZhongwenGui - 06-10-2022

@mothered wich store and technique do you suggest to SE Samsung S22 ultra?

RE: LIT Method help - mothered - 06-11-2022

(06-10-2022, 05:33 PM)ZhongwenGui Wrote: @mothered wich store and technique do you suggest to SE Samsung S22 ultra?
At the time of this post, Apple Is predominantly not cross-checking weights with the EB/missing Item method.

Many members have succeeded SEing cell phones using the said method.

RE: LIT Method help - wideputin - 06-11-2022

(06-10-2022, 12:51 PM)mothered Wrote:
(06-10-2022, 12:14 PM)wideputin Wrote: Amazon mainly but other retailers such as AO or Curry’s PC, John Lewis as well. Items I’m thinking of doing are Prebuilts, Computer parts, phones etc., and possibly expensive jewellery.
Given there's an array of suitable methods available, Is there a reason why you're opting for the LIT?
LIT seems to be an easier and fool proof method compared to all the others. The chance of my refund request being rejected, especially with amazon considering they ban accounts when other methods are used, is next to nothing due to the fact that it’s the carrier’s fault every time. It just seems to be a low effort universal method to me. So is there a working LIT method or is there an easier universal way that outperforms it like you were suggesting?

RE: LIT Method help - mothered - 06-11-2022

(06-11-2022, 04:17 PM)wideputin Wrote: LIT seems to be an easier and fool proof method compared to all the others.
How many times have you used It and succeeded?

(06-11-2022, 04:17 PM)wideputin Wrote: The chance of my refund request being rejected, especially with amazon considering they ban accounts when other methods are used, is next to nothing due to the fact that it’s the carrier’s fault every time.
Account closures are due to SE'ers neglecting to refund with common sense and good judgement, and not a direct result of the method per se.

In terms of the LIT, It has an array of Inconsistences that ultimately exposes Its Intention more often than not.

(06-11-2022, 04:17 PM)wideputin Wrote: So is there a working LIT method
As with the flawed so-called FTID, I don't support the LIT so I won't comment on It.

(06-11-2022, 04:17 PM)wideputin Wrote: or is there an easier universal way that outperforms it like you were suggesting?
You haven't provided any details, so It's Impossible to generalize.

As said, who's the company you're planning to SE and what's the Item description?

RE: LIT Method help - wideputin - 06-11-2022

(06-11-2022, 04:43 PM)mothered Wrote:
(06-11-2022, 04:17 PM)wideputin Wrote: LIT seems to be an easier and fool proof method compared to all the others.
How many times have you used It and succeeded?

(06-11-2022, 04:17 PM)wideputin Wrote: The chance of my refund request being rejected, especially with amazon considering they ban accounts when other methods are used, is next to nothing due to the fact that it’s the carrier’s fault every time.
Account closures are due to SE'ers neglecting to refund with common sense and good judgement, and not a direct result of the method per se.

In terms of the LIT, It has an array of Inconsistences that ultimately exposes Its Intention more often than not.

(06-11-2022, 04:17 PM)wideputin Wrote: So is there a working LIT method
As with the so-called flawed FTID, I don't support the LIT so I won't comment on It.

(06-11-2022, 04:17 PM)wideputin Wrote: or is there an easier universal way that outperforms it like you were suggesting?
You haven't provided any details, so It's Impossible to generalize.

As said, who's the company you're planning to SE and what's the Item description?
I think I’ve said this earlier, the companies are retailers like curry’s, AO, Amazon, John Lewis, and Apple. The items are electronics such as laptops, phones, and computer parts. Maybe even expensive jewellery.

RE: LIT Method help - mothered - 06-11-2022

(06-11-2022, 04:51 PM)wideputin Wrote: I think I’ve said this earlier, the companies are retailers like curry’s, AO, Amazon, John Lewis, and Apple. The items are electronics such as laptops, phones, and computer parts. Maybe even expensive jewellery.
A given traditional method Is based on the nature of the Item, as well as the company's operations.

For Instance, you wouldn't use the wrong Item received method against John Lewis - their CCTV footage would deem the Item was picked, packed and dispatched correctly. Apple on the other hand, tend to release themselves from liability when claiming nonreceipt of goods, hence the DNA method Is out of the question. Amazon may require an OTP on delivery, which again puts an end to the DNA. Currys also has CCTV cameras In operation - no need to elaborate further.

Please name the company and Item, specifically.