Login Register




The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.


I will scream at the next person who tells me Macs are secure! filter_list
Author
Message
I will scream at the next person who tells me Macs are secure! #31
(11-17-2013, 03:06 AM)Jolly Wrote: It's kinda good that they're well off put i'm not really sure if a Mac is suitable for common school work... that kinda seems like flashing away the money on something pointless...

It's my graphic design class.
#MakeSinisterlySexyAgain

Reply

RE: I will scream at the next person who tells me Macs are secure! #32
(10-31-2013, 10:13 PM)Shad0w Wrote: An operating system is just as secure as how cautious the user of it is.

So true.

Reply

RE: I will scream at the next person who tells me Macs are secure! #33
According to the Author's site:
Quote:The original flaw was a bug in Unix and sudo and allows the execution of changing the date and time to escalate to root permissions from a normal user.

This being said, this exploit really proves nothing as it can be replicated on almost all other unix boxes with the same version of sudo. Not a "Mac" vulnerability, but a sudo one.

Reply

I will scream at the next person who tells me Macs are secure! #34
If I run a forum and install a vuln plugin, it my fault if my forum gets hacked. This is a very basic exploit, and should have been found.
#MakeSinisterlySexyAgain

Reply

RE: I will scream at the next person who tells me Macs are secure! #35
(11-17-2013, 04:30 PM)Putin Wrote: Changing date to 0 grants root priv.

Yes I looked at the original post and saw that.

I would read the edit to my last post, I still stand by the fact that this isn't anything to "prove those mac people wrong".

Reply

I will scream at the next person who tells me Macs are secure! #36
(11-17-2013, 04:32 PM)Pens Wrote: Yes I looked at the original post and saw that.

I would read the edit to my last post, I still stand by the fact that this isn't anything to "prove those mac people wrong".

I edited my reply, and I have no problem with Macs. I have my own. I just don't think people without security knowledge can run around saying their box is unhackable.
#MakeSinisterlySexyAgain

Reply

RE: I will scream at the next person who tells me Macs are secure! #37
But in all serious who's going to cmd / ssh a mac system lol, would you not have to physically be there for this?

Reply

RE: I will scream at the next person who tells me Macs are secure! #38
(11-17-2013, 07:32 PM)Jay Wrote: But in all serious who's going to cmd / ssh a mac system lol, would you not have to physically be there for this?
You don't need physical access for the exploit.
#MakeSinisterlySexyAgain

Reply

RE: I will scream at the next person who tells me Macs are secure! #39
Rel1k overcomplicated this greatly.

systemsetup -setusingnetworktime Off -settimezone GMT -setdate 01:01:1970 -settime 00:00
sudo -i
???
PROFIT

(11-17-2013, 04:20 PM)Pens Wrote: According to the Author's site:

This being said, this exploit really proves nothing as it can be replicated on almost all other unix boxes with the same version of sudo. Not a "Mac" vulnerability, but a sudo one.

Actually, it can only be replicated when the attacker has the privilege to set the date.

(11-17-2013, 07:32 PM)Jay Wrote: But in all serious who's going to cmd / ssh a mac system lol, would you not have to physically be there for this?

You're stupid.

Also, Macs can be as secure as anything else with a competent administrator.
I'd be more than happy to prove this if anyone would like to question it.
(This post was last modified: 11-17-2013, 10:07 PM by Reiko.)
PGP
Sign: F202 79C9 76F7 40BB 54EC 494F 5DEF 1D70 14C1 C4CC
Encrypt: A5B3 1B21 55E1 80AF 4C6E DE83 467B 8EFC 3DEE 681C
Auth: CD55 E8A5 1A08 2933 8BA6 BC88 D81F 1943 739A 3C47

Reply

RE: I will scream at the next person who tells me Macs are secure! #40
Okay, I think we all understand that Mac's suck and can be hacked just as easy as Linux and Windows. Let's move on to the next topic lol.

Reply