[stevenadams2323]

isnt it a bit late? item is coming today. How long can the gap be between the 2 orders.

2-3 days.

Use Express (or for 10$ more, next day) shipping and you'll make It. It's still a significant profit with the extra dollars spent on shipping.

rn im just going to tell him to dump it no signature.

Be careful.

If you provide delivery Instructions, you're liable for lost shipments.

What i do is through ring, it always works as its just the delivery drivers word against mine, could be an excuse for laziness. there is no documented factual evidence i told him to leave it there with no signature. Ring works like a charm with SE's and i consider it essential these days.

---

isnt it a bit late? item is coming today. How long can the gap be between the 2 orders.

2-3 days.

Use Express (or for 10$ more, next day) shipping and you'll make It. It's still a significant profit with the extra dollars spent on shipping.

rn im just going to tell him to dump it no signature.

Be careful.

If you provide delivery Instructions, you're liable for lost shipments.

Do you think wrong item is better than me going through the dna? this is their terms and conditions about lost shipments

'If we fail to comply with these Terms and Conditions of Sale, we are responsible for loss or damage you suffer that is a foreseeable result of our breaking the contract or our failing to use reasonable skill and care, but we are not responsible for any loss or damage that is not foreseeable. Loss or damage is foreseeable if either it is obvious that it will happen or if, at the time the contract was made, both we and you knew it might happen.'

[mothered]

What i do is through ring, it always works as its just the delivery drivers word against mine, could be an excuse for laziness. there is no documented factual evidence i told him to leave it there with no signature. Ring works like a charm with SE's and i consider it essential these days.

Yes, the driver's word holds no value to verify events.

I've known a few drivers who actually record conversations on their device, which Is what my previous post Is based on. Always allow for probabilities - you never know If and when they may happen.

Do you think wrong item is better than me going through the dna? this is their terms and conditions about lost shipments

'If we fail to comply with these Terms and Conditions of Sale, we are responsible for loss or damage you suffer that is a foreseeable result of our breaking the contract or our failing to use reasonable skill and care, but we are not responsible for any loss or damage that is not foreseeable. Loss or damage is foreseeable if either it is obvious that it will happen or if, at the time the contract was made, both we and you knew it might happen.'

Their terms are broad and not clearly documented:

it is obvious that it will happen

Define "obvious"?

both we and you knew it might happen

"Knew It might happen"?
How do they conclude the thoughts of one's mentality?

The DNA can still be used, but given there are many variables In their terms, It may be a lengthy process.

[stevenadams2323]

What i do is through ring, it always works as its just the delivery drivers word against mine, could be an excuse for laziness. there is no documented factual evidence i told him to leave it there with no signature. Ring works like a charm with SE's and i consider it essential these days.

Yes, the driver's word holds no value to verify events.

I've known a few drivers who actually record conversations on their device, which Is what my previous post Is based on. Always allow for probabilities - you never know If and when they may happen.

Do you think wrong item is better than me going through the dna? this is their terms and conditions about lost shipments

'If we fail to comply with these Terms and Conditions of Sale, we are responsible for loss or damage you suffer that is a foreseeable result of our breaking the contract or our failing to use reasonable skill and care, but we are not responsible for any loss or damage that is not foreseeable. Loss or damage is foreseeable if either it is obvious that it will happen or if, at the time the contract was made, both we and you knew it might happen.'

Their terms are broad and not clearly documented:

it is obvious that it will happen

Define "obvious"?

both we and you knew it might happen

"Knew It might happen"?
How do they conclude the thoughts of one's mentality?

The DNA can still be used, but given there are many variables In their terms, It may be a lengthy process.

i believe they are stating from their perspective that if anythiung is influenced by the person purchasing, they lose liability and we own liability.

if it is in their control and they fail to follow the terms they set out, then they are liable. The statemnt does show they so have liability for lost goods but its worded extremely strangely.

I've known a few drivers who actually record conversations on their device, which Is what my previous post Is based on. Always allow for probabilities - you never know If and when they may happen.

ive not heard of this before. might have to be wary of it.

[mothered]

i believe they are stating from their perspective that if anythiung is influenced by the person purchasing, they lose liability and we own liability.

There's another point - define "Influenced", and how Is It conclusively established (based on that alone) that the buyer Is responsible?

I understand what they've stipulated In their terms, but as said, It's vague, broad, and not definitive hence open to a number of Interpretations.

[2ndround]

What i do is through ring, it always works as its just the delivery drivers word against mine, could be an excuse for laziness. there is no documented factual evidence i told him to leave it there with no signature. Ring works like a charm with SE's and i consider it essential these days.

Yes, the driver's word holds no value to verify events.

I've known a few drivers who actually record conversations on their device, which Is what my previous post Is based on. Always allow for probabilities - you never know If and when they may happen.

Do you think wrong item is better than me going through the dna? this is their terms and conditions about lost shipments

'If we fail to comply with these Terms and Conditions of Sale, we are responsible for loss or damage you suffer that is a foreseeable result of our breaking the contract or our failing to use reasonable skill and care, but we are not responsible for any loss or damage that is not foreseeable. Loss or damage is foreseeable if either it is obvious that it will happen or if, at the time the contract was made, both we and you knew it might happen.'

Their terms are broad and not clearly documented:

it is obvious that it will happen

Define "obvious"?

both we and you knew it might happen

"Knew It might happen"?
How do they conclude the thoughts of one's mentality?

The DNA can still be used, but given there are many variables In their terms, It may be a lengthy process.

Recording calls without informing the other party is illegal in many countries and thefore cannot be used.
A company providing that as evidence would open themselves up for more risk than its worth.

[ABC157PLM]

Dude don’t dna, Canada goose always makes you sign. The method for cg is u either fully ftid or send back an empty envelope with return address removed. Once delivered, u contact them, they run around in circles for 2 weeks then refund u.

What version are you on about when you say FTID fully? as in chanding barcode and identification number?

[Jwilsa]

Dude don’t dna, Canada goose always makes you sign. The method for cg is u either fully ftid or send back an empty envelope with return address removed. Once delivered, u contact them, they run around in circles for 2 weeks then refund u.

What version are you on about when you say FTID fully? as in chanding barcode and identification number?

From personal experience, I would say don’t change barcode (it’ll work just take longer). Only remove the return address and change the tracking number (not the barcode). Stick label onto an enveloped filled with ads and send it off. 1 week later contact support and they open investigation. 1-2 weeks later refund confirmation. If you opt to send an empty box or envelope there’s a chance they can pin it on you because they’ll see your name on tracking. DNA would also work but it would just be headaches because with a signature there’s a chance ups driver comes to your house etc. If you pay with PayPal and do ftid it’s pretty much guaranteed refund.

[Fugayse]

HI guys,

I’ve just done an order with CG. Thing is I’m going to try DNA it, I just did another brand dna with amiri and it was ordered early September. Thing is the resolution was around 2 weeks ago. Is it too soon to do another DNA? I might have to reject the package.

yo how did you DNA Amiri. Did you do it through amiri website or a 3rd party seller. Please respond a nigga needs some drip

[mothered]

Recording calls without informing the other party is illegal in many countries and thefore cannot be used.
A company providing that as evidence would open themselves up for more risk than its worth.

I'm not referring to disclosing the recording as evidence, but rather using It Internally to verify receipt of goods.

[stevenadams2323]

Can’t lie I don’t even like the jacket. Just going to return it and try another time 😂😂