Login Register




The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.


Amazon : SE smartphone > 500€ filter_list
Author
Message
Amazon : SE smartphone > 500€ #1
DELETE THIS TOPIC PLEASE ADMIN Heart
(This post was last modified: 03-31-2018, 12:14 PM by Antitrax83.)

Reply

RE: Amazon : SE smartphone <500€ #2
PM me brother, I can help you refund it. Done an S8 and a laptop 600+ recently Smile

Reply

RE: Amazon : SE smartphone <500€ #3
Yes, you most certainly can. I don't usually refund Amazon, but considering how many do you have a simple did not arrive would suffice. Or wrong item was there. Your choice.

Reply

RE: Amazon : SE smartphone <500€ #4
Shouldn't the less-than sign in your title be a greater-than sign? Smartphones like the Samsung Galaxy S9 currently have a price of $719.99 which is a littlebit less then ~600€ which is > than the 500€ in your threads title.

Reply

RE: Amazon : SE smartphone <500€ #5
Yes I am wrong on the symbol haha

Of course I would rather advice before paying someone, if it's easier with an account that is 8 years without any refund I think I can try it alone so I take all your advice friends!

Reply

RE: Amazon : SE smartphone <500€ #6
@mothered maybe you could fix the title :)

As @JohnKokolo already said, I'd just say I never received the package (in case they don't want you to sign for it).

Reply

RE: Amazon : SE smartphone <500€ #7
(03-22-2018, 11:07 PM)chunky Wrote: @mothered maybe you could fix the title Smile

Easily fixed.

Done.
[Image: AD83g1A.png]

Reply

RE: Amazon : SE smartphone > 500€ #8
Thank you for updating the title!

If I ever have to sign the parcel, what do you advise me to say to friends?

Reply

RE: Amazon : SE smartphone > 500€ #9
DELETE THIS TOPIC PLEASE ADMIN Heart
(This post was last modified: 03-31-2018, 12:14 PM by Antitrax83.)

Reply

RE: Amazon : SE smartphone > 500€ #10
DELETE THIS TOPIC PLEASE ADMIN Heart
(This post was last modified: 03-31-2018, 12:13 PM by Antitrax83.)

Reply