93 grams pushing it with empty box on Amazon? 12-14-2020, 02:08 PM
#1
Is that weight pushing it? Also, i refunded them on the 19th October but i have made 13 legit purchases since, is this sufficient?
| 93 grams pushing it with empty box on Amazon? filter_list | |
(12-14-2020, 02:08 PM)Rednaxela1 Wrote: Is that weight pushing it?It's fine, the absolute maximum Is 120 grams (and that's pushing It to Its limit), so you'll be good to go.
(12-14-2020, 02:08 PM)Rednaxela1 Wrote: Also, i refunded them on the 19th October but i have made 13 legit purchases since, is this sufficient?The timing and legit purchases after your last SE, will suffice to hit another one without raising suspicion.
(12-15-2020, 09:40 AM)db8803 Wrote: Also they can deny the claim even for 50g.On what grounds?
(12-15-2020, 09:48 AM)mothered Wrote:(12-15-2020, 09:40 AM)db8803 Wrote: Also they can deny the claim even for 50g.On what grounds?
The shipping scales will not Increment that weight, so their justification for the Item enclosed will be Inconclusive.
(12-15-2020, 03:36 PM)db8803 Wrote: As i said on an account with too many DNA, empty box, missing item, they can deny the claim. It's happened to me 3-4 times back in time.Absolutely. Too many claims In close timing and using the same method with high value Items and so forth, will certainly raise suspicion to the point of not only declining the claim, but also the possibility of closing the account.
Quote:Also they can deny the claim even for 50g.
(12-15-2020, 03:41 PM)Jerban Wrote: Amazon denying claims is almost entirely about your accounts current standing, and not the actual SE.It's a combination of both.
(12-15-2020, 03:55 PM)mothered Wrote:(12-15-2020, 03:36 PM)db8803 Wrote: As i said on an account with too many DNA, empty box, missing item, they can deny the claim. It's happened to me 3-4 times back in time.Absolutely. Too many claims In close timing and using the same method with high value Items and so forth, will certainly raise suspicion to the point of not only declining the claim, but also the possibility of closing the account.
Your reasoning as per below, appears to be purely related to the SE.
Quote:Also they can deny the claim even for 50g.
(12-15-2020, 03:41 PM)Jerban Wrote: Amazon denying claims is almost entirely about your accounts current standing, and not the actual SE.It's a combination of both.
For Instance, they won't approve your claim for a 10k diamond ring with no questions asked, just because your account Is matured over a period of 4 years with a clean record.
(12-15-2020, 05:01 PM)Jerban Wrote:You've made some valid points.(12-15-2020, 03:55 PM)mothered Wrote:(12-15-2020, 03:36 PM)db8803 Wrote: As i said on an account with too many DNA, empty box, missing item, they can deny the claim. It's happened to me 3-4 times back in time.Absolutely. Too many claims In close timing and using the same method with high value Items and so forth, will certainly raise suspicion to the point of not only declining the claim, but also the possibility of closing the account.
Your reasoning as per below, appears to be purely related to the SE.
Quote:Also they can deny the claim even for 50g.
(12-15-2020, 03:41 PM)Jerban Wrote: Amazon denying claims is almost entirely about your accounts current standing, and not the actual SE.It's a combination of both.
For Instance, they won't approve your claim for a 10k diamond ring with no questions asked, just because your account Is matured over a period of 4 years with a clean record.
Thats true, I dont live in a world of absolute truths, maybe i took that for granted.
As for most things, it is quite circumstancial, but even if u find the most suitable item for 10$ and your acount is in bad standing they might just tell you to gtfo, if you're account is in general good standing they'll approve of most refunds within the limits of reason.
I remember when i claimed my first empty box, just a pair of Airpod pro's they weighed well over 100 gr. maybe even 300 gr. I did the same thing later with another company as a partial, on a item weighing almost 500 grams.
It's obvious thought that the lighter the item is thus harder is it to document the presence of it within a package..