RE: -50 reputation 02-20-2017, 10:20 AM
#21
| -50 reputation filter_list | |
RE: -50 reputation 02-20-2017, 11:30 AM
#22
(02-20-2017, 10:20 AM)Mr.Kurd Wrote: he had been banned.
If he decides to do so, he'll be back In one month's time.
That Is, It's not a permanent ban.
RE: -50 reputation 02-20-2017, 03:56 PM
#24
(02-20-2017, 11:30 AM)mothered Wrote:(02-20-2017, 10:20 AM)Mr.Kurd Wrote: he had been banned.
If he decides to do so, he'll be back In one month's time.
That Is, It's not a permanent ban.
Give it some time lol
Scientia potentia est
![[Image: inkexplosion.jpg]](http://i0.wp.com/techverse.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/inkexplosion.jpg)
RE: -50 reputation 02-20-2017, 07:38 PM
#25
Lol I see why this guy trolls now.
You guys are so triggered it's not even funny.
You guys are so triggered it's not even funny.
Who Knows?
RE: -50 reputation 02-21-2017, 10:56 AM
#27
(02-20-2017, 03:56 PM)DarkMuse Wrote: Give it some time lol
If he continues without variation for the better, then yes, I certainly agree.
RE: -50 reputation 02-22-2017, 05:23 AM
#28
RE: -50 reputation 02-22-2017, 11:01 AM
#29
(02-22-2017, 05:23 AM)Ender Wrote: I bet he'll be perma-banned by the time he reaches 0 rep (seems to be going back up)
Yes, probably so.
If he's causing more so of a negative Impact on this board, then that sort of behavior Is not what this forum needs. Of course, I'm only expressing my opinion, nothing more.
RE: -50 reputation 02-22-2017, 10:40 PM
#30
(02-21-2017, 10:56 AM)mothered Wrote:(02-20-2017, 03:56 PM)DarkMuse Wrote: Give it some time lol
If he continues without variation for the better, then yes, I certainly agree.
What kind of motivation would there be for him to change?
Scientia potentia est
![[Image: inkexplosion.jpg]](http://i0.wp.com/techverse.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/inkexplosion.jpg)











.
![[+]](https://sinister.li/images/modern/collapse_collapsed.png)










