[w00t]

http://techglam.com/how-tech-giant-apple...afe-owner/

Not only did they not sue, they lost their legal battle to a small cafe. More to the point, their argument made complete sense, as the cafe was using its logo on electronics, thereby unfairly restricting Apple from selling their products in Germany.

I'm well aware that the M14 is capable of automatic fire. I also attempted to keep the argument at a fairly basic level, as most of the time people trying to argue guns are only aware of them from CoD. The M4 is preferred for general combat because its rate of fire is faster on auto, and the recoil is more manageable, especially when firing automatic. Special ops still uses the M14 extensively, because, well, they tend to be better trained, and( and this is being over general ) tend to use semi-automatic over automatic. It wasn't just because some congressman was getting his house remodeled by the same people that owned Colt at the time. It's also worth noting it was the M16 selected over the M14, which was mostly due to production costs and ammo capacity. In Vietnam, it became a war of suppressive fire until you could effectively clear out the tunnels.

Hezbollah is on the other side, though. If we can get those two lovely organizations to hate each other instead of us and our interests, we've done a good job.

Yes, it is. That's why it's a good thing the supreme court banned it. Explicitly.