[Hora1]

Ah, I use warehouse as a more general blanket term to include company's/manufacturer's/distributor's warehouse. Thanks for the correction though, I wasn't actually aware of that.


I always believed "empty box" worked best saying the package was completely empty, as in the shipping package contained nothing inside. Thus actually making it a company distributor problem?
Not that they received the product box but not the product itself. I can see how this becomes a manufacturer problem and not a company distributor problem.

Why product not in product box > product not in the shipping package at all? I can definitely see the benefit if the product itself is small in a bigger package, like a CPU. But otherwise, it seems like they both have their own pros and cons.

Ye the thing is, they often record when they pack everything and they Also Weight the package when it goes from shop and when it comes to the postal Office, so to say its Empty could be hard and probly a long investigstion. I have to think a little before i choose method.

But the point of EB is that the weight isn't registered on consignment because it is so light? So irregardless of when they record weight, it wouldn't register.

So you think i Should tell them the package was completly Empty instead of just telning them the AirPods was gone. I mean i think its hard for them tp prove the AirPods was there of i email them as soon as i get t he package and tell them the seal was broken and the AirPods gone, after that i just make a police report of if have to and a compliant at the Courier?

---

Im pretty new tp this so i appreciate everyone is Willing to help! Thanks everyone!