RE: Amazon U.K. ftid 06-08-2020, 11:33 PM
#8
(06-08-2020, 09:20 PM)mothered Wrote: Depending on the Item, there may be a better method than the FTID.What are those criteria for items? Naming the most popular methods,
What Item are you planning to SE?
< 100g -> empty box
big item -> DNA
rest -> FTID/DNA?
(06-08-2020, 11:09 PM)Roadman Wrote:FTID (or really any method) isn't based off price point.(06-08-2020, 10:44 PM)Justaguy121 Wrote:Go for FTID. IPhone 11 price range sounds about right for FTID.(06-08-2020, 09:20 PM)mothered Wrote: Depending on the Item, there may be a better method than the FTID.An iPhone 11
What Item are you planning to SE?
On topic, I've noticed on Amazon returns labels there's one or two additional "barcodes" which I assume are used by the courier company to speed up the sorting process.
@mothered, since you mentioned Amazon can scan these barcodes themselves to find out the original TID anyway regardless if you edit out the TID; would you recommend to completely remove these additional "barcodes"? (I put barcodes in brackets as they look similar to QR but aren't exactly a QR.
Would appreciate the advice.
If they aren't used by the courier and specifically only by Amazon, then you should remove it. Be careful they aren't a maxi code or something as those are used by courier. (if you remove a label that the courier needs, they will reprint the label for you, presumably with all the original data)
Goal is to make it seem like the package is junk and not part of any return.
(This post was last modified: 06-08-2020, 11:37 PM by Filament.)
Unfortunately, I have to retire from SE.
Thanks for all the fun, knowledge, and discussions while I was active! SL really is an amazing community! Keep spreading your knowledge and grow as a community.
Thanks for all the fun, knowledge, and discussions while I was active! SL really is an amazing community! Keep spreading your knowledge and grow as a community.




![[+]](https://sinister.li/images/modern/collapse_collapsed.png)