RE: Highschool student hacks 150k IoT printers 02-22-2017, 07:52 AM
#15
(02-14-2017, 11:05 AM)mothered Wrote:(02-13-2017, 06:47 AM)Jiggly Wrote:(02-13-2017, 05:41 AM)mothered Wrote: Absolutely.
A device Is only as secure as the person who operates It. Users need to be cautious with the "Task" they're performing.
T= Training.
A= Awareness.
S= Skill set.
K= Know-how.
And In a corporate environment, a lot of the above comes from the lack of company policies to educate their employees.
Holy crap, I didn't even realise this was a possibility. It seems obvious now but I'm sure I've made these mistakes somewhere along the line.
Ironically I have to create a policy brief for a class project, it would be amusing to see if I could use this as a suggestion for mine xD
The T.A.S.K (as elaborated above) Is something I formulated, mainly for the purpose of an "easy-to-remember" approach when educating others on cyber security, prevention of social engineering etc.
I didn't plagiarize It from anyone. You can well and truly use It. Simply add your policies and/or recommendations to each category.
T.A.S.K is pretty well thought of. I'll be keeping it in mind for the future.
![[Image: 4GNsK67.png]](http://i.imgur.com/4GNsK67.png)
























![[+]](https://sinister.li/images/modern/collapse_collapsed.png)