[Theós]

If two people were to have the same experience and skill level of making a shoe and it took 2 hours to make a perfect shoe, who's shoe would come out better? Person A, who spent 10 minutes or Person B who spent 3 hours?

What? That question makes no sense. If two people, with the exact same amount of experience and skill level is making a shoe, and it took them 2 hours to make the prefect shoe, who's shoe would become better? Person A who use 10 min or Person B who spent 3 hours? Though you just said it took them 2 hours to make it. For the sake of the argument, the question would be better off as;

If two people were making a shoe, each with different set of skills and experience, the more skilled used 1 hour and the less skilled used 3, who made the better?

In both examples however, the answer is the same. It depends. The more skilled person would have the better outcome, but the one that put the most taught behind it could surpass pure skill. Though what I said earlier, blaming the amount of time used on something isn't a valid excuse for the lack of quality. Lack of quality comes from lack of passion and/or skill in a subject. If it is passion, then you are just being lazy or don't even want to do it. If it is skill then you can practice it. Saying; "Well I only used a few min, lol" is being lazy and trying to blame it on anything else than yourself.

So if time wasn't the problem, it's me? Oh. What if I said, if I spend 1 more hour and the thread design came out better, would the time spent not matter as the catalyst for the quality. Passion doesn't magically make things better, you need time as well, which is something I do not have atm. Crovus, you sexy little slut, kiss me.