RE: Story and a question. 02-01-2016, 04:09 AM
#9
(02-01-2016, 01:33 AM)The Real Slim Shady Wrote: Wouldnt this make far more sense if we were the jury. Lawyers have nothing to do with who's innocent and who's guilty in a courtroom...
No, it wouldn't. The jury doesn't make an argument on either sides behalf but they listen to the arguments from the lawyers. You are supposed to choose a side and to your best abilities substantiate your case.
(02-01-2016, 03:04 AM)mothered Wrote: Based on the context of the statement, I cannot be definitive In answering your question.
Who's to say the "8 people that could use his organs" are not pedophiles themselves? Was the actual pedophile (who needed surgery) actually convicted, awaiting trial or just classed as a pedophile by the local community? There's too many probabilities.
Yes, there are too many probabilities, that is technically the point of this question, it is too open for one to give a definitive answer but it is perfect to create an argument about what is right or wrong in both legal and moral view points.


![[+]](https://sinister.li/images/modern/collapse_collapsed.png)