[Arthur Curry]

I'm glad you call it rioting and not protesting because the former is more true. People love to use the first amendment as a shield by distorting what it actually says. The first amendment gives the right "peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances" in this case the people assembled (usually not peaceably) for a redress of grievances. In this case that redress was in the form of a grand jury investigation into the shooting of a black adult (no, he wasn't a teen - this word implies youth and though yes -- he is in teens we all know this connotes a much younger person -- he was an adult). The assemblies after the granting of the investigation are therefore nothing more than a disgusting attempt to condemn Darren Wilson through mob tactics as they were no longer assembling for a redress of grievances. Everyone involved in those riots should be ashamed of themselves. To them the officer was guilty until proven innocent -- why? Let's face it, it's because the officer is white.

Darren Wilson was in the right: there is no other way to see it now. If there wasn't even enough evidence to indict Darren Wilson, then there sure as hell was not enough to convict him. There were multiple witness statements, ballistic tests, and autopsies by world-renowned experts -- if there was a crime committed it would have came to light or at least have been questionable enough to warrant further litigation in a criminal court.