[Equinox]

Proven? Whats to prove? The statement I am making is that merely posting more than once in a row?? is not a reasonable definition of spam.

When I log on to a forum I load the most recent posts and start responding to topics. I have no intention of waiting 20 minutes between each response merely so I don't post consecutively. Do you not see how absurd that sounds?? I've got shit to do. I visit forums and post when I feel like taking a break from whatever it is I'm doing. Spending 2 hours here so I can make 5 responses without *spamming* (according to your definition) is ridiculous and do I'll do it in the time it actually takes to submit the response I want.

And I really fucking doubt any other member here is saying to themselves - hold up, I've made 2 responses in the last 5 minutes, I'd better take a 20 minute break so I don't spam.

---

Seems like a Catch-22 - Get banned for some absurd (no??) fucking reason and then get banned for multi-accounting which appears to be the only reasonable method of communicating with the staff? Make it a little easier to contact staff after a ban and maybe I wouldn't have resorted to creating a second account.

First off, you don't need to wait 20 minutes. Or any times at all. So stop trying to compare this forum to another. Secondly, I am done with this thread. You have been very immature and your use of language towards me is not appreciated.