[Woo]

I’m not sure if this is the case, but If OP did all of these to the same address, it’s probably gonna look helllaaa dodgy.

From my understanding retailers make a claim with the courier, say Royal Mail for example, to claim against the value of goods (or cost) which were damaged for reimbursement. Best case, just a few of these retailers claim back against Royal Mail (he’s done this 16 times I believe in one month excl Amazon). Royal Mail would likely notice the sudden volume of damaged goods to your address (or even local area) within a single month and would either question the courier, or you.

If the former, you’re screwing your courier over rather than the big corps and goes against my personal ethics. But if the latter, which I would imagine is far more likely, you can screw yourself over and get caught.

Of course I’m assuming they’ve all been delivered by RM, but relax with this method or else it could end up bad for you, all over some nice smelling water…

At the end of the day, do what ever you like, I don’t give a shit, it’s not my problem.

Yeah if hitting multiple times then spreading out the hits would definitely be the play here

Definitely, I believe you replied to one of my previous threads regarding this. I hit John Lewis months ago and I am still skeptical hitting them again.

I find this very concerning because the place I work with has a network of other similar businesses to relay orders.

These order details on our system goes years back. I have some from 2014 which has the billing address, name of buyer, recipient name and address etc. bare in mind this company is nowhere near as large as the retailers OP names, who deal with higher order values and volumes, who are probably also storing this data.

This makes me highly concerned about hitting the same store because if one detail is picked up from a previous SE, it may lead to further investigation.

Once again, I have no clue about the exact details of OP’s tactics/methods and if he’s vulnerable to such issues or not.