[mothered]

i've allways wondered from your same response on such events , is your goal from this repeating "to show evidence" process to be able to continue to the chargback point knowing there is a big chance going into your favor ? also on what ground's they comply and just give you a piece of their own CCTV footage while your claim is already denied .

As a social engineer yourself, It's paramount not to believe everything you're told. When you've attained years of experience In the SEing sector, you'll learn why It's the case.

Who's to say they didn't make the whole thing up?
Why should you take their word for It just because they told you so?
How many times have representatives made an error In judgment with their claim assessment and final decision?

No doubt your questions have been answered.

that's actually explained a recent experience where i was being told duo to a restriction of my account that i would'nt be able to withdraw my money back , after chatting with another agent he was glad to withdraw my money back to me despite the fact i was restricted , your such and interesting individual no wonder i look forward to be like you someday , whoever you are ... thank you

You're welcome.

In short, unless there's solid and conclusive evidence for the declined claim, always question the decision.