[fabrizio89]

Tell them It's the correct format, namely because It's the original report that was handed to you by the police officer.

If they still fail to use common sense, ask them to contact the station and get a copy sent via email/fax.

They’ve replied, finally in English saying:

Allow me to tell you, the Police Report that you sent us was reviewed by the superior department, which informs us that the document has inconsistencies and that for that reason it could not be validated, we ask you to send us the document again so that each part of it can be seen in a clear way to verify it again, we are here to serve you.

They continue to be vague on what inconsistencies they’ve found.
Nevertheless I’ve rescanned the PR and sent them, emphasising my discontent with all the time-wasting.
Hopefully we’ll get a move from here on.

Ridiculous.

The least they can do, Is be specific with the type(s) of Inconsistencies that need to be addressed. It's not hard to use a little common sense. At any rate, we shall await their reply.

I’m still waiting on a reply, tomorrow I’ll pressure them again.

As a backup plan, do you think it’s viable to process a normal return and then use the sealed box method? Replacing the Watch with a knockoff model.
Will that raise extra suspicion or their departments don’t communicate between themselves?
Thanks again