FTID3 test run 08-26-2021, 11:03 AM
#1
Hello,
I wanted to try the FTID3 method. I am still undecided, because many say it's bad, but many say it's good too, so I wanted to try it myself. With the right preparation, I (theoretically) don't think the method is bad at all. I would not send the envelope (possibly even directly a package) empty but fill it with garbage, that if an investigation is pending, at least the weight (and the dimensions) is right. In addition, possibly write on the package (e.g. with a bright easy-to-read color) that the package should be delivered to the address on the package (and not the one stored in the barcode). Maybe even on each side of the box?
Does anyone have ideas, suggestions, counter-arguments or ideas where I can try this method as a test? Should only be a test run, so no expensive orders.
I wanted to try the FTID3 method. I am still undecided, because many say it's bad, but many say it's good too, so I wanted to try it myself. With the right preparation, I (theoretically) don't think the method is bad at all. I would not send the envelope (possibly even directly a package) empty but fill it with garbage, that if an investigation is pending, at least the weight (and the dimensions) is right. In addition, possibly write on the package (e.g. with a bright easy-to-read color) that the package should be delivered to the address on the package (and not the one stored in the barcode). Maybe even on each side of the box?
Does anyone have ideas, suggestions, counter-arguments or ideas where I can try this method as a test? Should only be a test run, so no expensive orders.
(This post was last modified: 08-26-2021, 11:07 AM by K03NT3S31N.)
Experienced Social Engineer
![[+]](https://sinister.li/images/modern/collapse_collapsed.png)
