Potential Ban on Anime Educational Book 01-21-2021, 08:34 PM
#1
A book, titled Anime from Akira to Howl's Moving Castle: Experiencing Contemporary Japanese Animation, is facing a potential ban from the curriculum of the Kent State University. Despite the book being in circulation for around 20 years, Dr. Susan Napier has been called by Ohio lawmakers who are describing the book as "pornographic". It turns out, one chapter explores porn in Japanese animation, including all the good to bad parts (such a violence towards females).
Source
In my opinion, this is a moment a mountain has been made out of a molehill. I don't believe an institution should face losing 150 million in funding because a parent 1) forgot to read the fine print, and 2) is unable to have a mature conversation with their child about porn.
What are your thoughts?
Code:
When asked what material in the book could have caused offense, she answered: "It's one chapter. The chapter on pornography in Japanese animation. Some of the stuff is very unpleasant. It does show real violence against women. I thought it was actually important to bring up pornography. It was reasonably widely available and I knew people in the West were looking at it, so I thought some people should explore it. I thought if you wanted to understand anime as a total part of Japanese culture, you have to be aware of this. You don't have to watch it. I never suggested that."
The complaints about the book originated from a parent of a high school student who took Kent State's Freshman Composition course. Most of Kent State's student body are adults but the college does allow students from 7th to 12th grade to take courses at the campus. The legal guardian of an underage student must sign an acknowledgment that materials in a course may include mature adult themes before they enroll in a course.
Ohio State Rep. Reggie Stoltzfus and Representative Don Jones referred to the book as "pornographic" and sent a letter to Kent State urging the administration to not assign adult material to underage students and review its policies. Rep. Stoltzfus told Fox19 News that the administration disagrees with the representatives about the book's contents. The congressman said he intends to purchase copies of the book for his "friends" in the general assembly to review and the results may affect the school's funding.
“We're gonna look through this book, and we're gonna decide if this university is worthy of giving 150 million dollars of taxpayer dollars to it every year,” Rep. Stoltzfus stated.Source
In my opinion, this is a moment a mountain has been made out of a molehill. I don't believe an institution should face losing 150 million in funding because a parent 1) forgot to read the fine print, and 2) is unable to have a mature conversation with their child about porn.
What are your thoughts?
![[Image: 4GNsK67.png]](http://i.imgur.com/4GNsK67.png)























![[+]](https://sinister.li/images/modern/collapse_collapsed.png)










![[Image: 7ajmN5P.jpg]](https://i.imgur.com/7ajmN5P.jpg)




![[Image: qcYJ3l.png]](https://i.skull.moe/u/qcYJ3l.png)