Login Register




The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.


Easiest SE for shoes filter_list
Author
Message
Easiest SE for shoes #1
Requirements: Money for the shoe you want (will be refunded)
1.) You must first order a shoe from any store, for example, some Nike Adapts from Nike.com
2.) After you receive that package you must contact their support and say something along the lines of, "Hey, I just received my package but something very odd happened. I opened the box and I saw there was only one shoe!"

3.) After this they will say if you want a refund of if you want them to send you another package after returning that one. You're going to ask for a refund and ship the package back to them but keep one of course.

4.) You repeat this but, with a different store such as footlocker or any other store. After receiving two refunds and keeping one of each shoe you'll have a free pair of shoes Smile

Note: Only do this once per address per store, you can put a typo in your address if you want to do it again or just wait 3 or 4 months to do it again just to be safe.

[+] 1 user Likes fsociety's post
Reply

RE: Easiest SE for shoes #2
Moved from the Tutorials forum to Social Engineering.

Is this actually the work of your own?
[Image: AD83g1A.png]

Reply

RE: Easiest SE for shoes #3
Just to add: most of us have feet that differ in size. While the difference isn't too big for most of us (up to half a size), quite a few people should (or could) be wearing different shoe sizes on each foot - often with benefits for their health (relieving back pain etc).

This method is ideal to get an unequal sized pair of shoes of your choice - which is otherwise difficult/expensive to accomplish.

Reply

RE: Easiest SE for shoes #4
I've tried this in the past and it is working without any issues.

Reply

RE: Easiest SE for shoes #5
Nike Is pretty simple to SE.

For the most part, they don't cross-check weights when using the missing Item/partial method.
[Image: AD83g1A.png]

Reply

RE: Easiest SE for shoes #6
(08-28-2020, 08:54 AM)fsociety Wrote: Requirements: Money for the shoe you want  (will be refunded)
1.) You must first order a shoe from any store, for example, some Nike Adapts from Nike.com 
2.) After you receive that package you must contact their support and say something along the lines of, "Hey, I just received my package but something very odd happened. I opened the box and I saw there was only one shoe!" 

3.) After this they will say if you want a refund of if you want them to send you another package after returning that one. You're going to ask for a refund and ship the package back to them but keep one of course.

4.) You repeat this but, with a different store such as footlocker or any other store. After receiving two refunds and keeping one of each shoe you'll have a free pair of shoes Smile

Note: Only do this once per address per store, you can put a typo in your address if you want to do it again or just wait 3 or 4 months to do it again just to be safe.

Hey dude, will this work with 500 euro shoes? or is this a method for more low end like 200 euro? Also will this work on online designer stores for example bijenkorf: https://www.debijenkorf.de/??
(This post was last modified: 09-06-2020, 10:20 PM by absoluteunit. Edit Reason: needed to add details. )

Reply

RE: Easiest SE for shoes #7
(09-06-2020, 10:16 PM)absoluteunit Wrote: Hey dude, will this work with 500 euro shoes? or is this a method for more low end like 200 euro? Also will this work on online designer stores for example bijenkorf: https://www.debijenkorf.de/??

It really depends on the store. The bigger the company, the more likely they have busy warehouse bees throwing your order into empty boxes before sending them off.

If it's a smaller company with more exquisite products the chance of them individually checking the goods prior to dispatch increases. Buy a £2000 pair of shoes from a high-end shoe maker and they'll usually check the pair carefully for any blemishes etc before sending them out. They live off their reputation, hence any (major) issue with the shoes might hurt them quite a bit. Claiming a missing shoe with such a procedure in place is unlikely to succeed (easily). Whether it works with a £500 pair depends on the company in question. As always, do your research.

Reply

RE: Easiest SE for shoes #8
Its a really easy to use method, especially if you use two online retailers instead of going to Nike for one of them. As for the value and price, pretty much any value can do, and even designer shoes are susceptible given they use shipping partners who handle inventory and logistics as it would place the blame on the logistics carrier for losing the other shoe.

(08-28-2020, 10:50 AM)mothered Wrote: Is this actually the work of your own?

Not sure about the writeup but this is something that has circulated in more or less the same form for years.
You can find me on Keybase
"Reach the state of ubiquity, and you will be in control"
Student, Technician, Designer, and more.
[Image: YUpAMpx.png]

Reply

RE: Easiest SE for shoes #9
(09-07-2020, 04:17 AM)zorrophreak Wrote: Not sure about the writeup but this is something that has circulated in more or less the same form for years.
Agree, hence my question.

It's nothing new.
[Image: AD83g1A.png]

Reply

RE: Easiest SE for shoes #10
(09-07-2020, 04:36 AM)mothered Wrote:
(09-07-2020, 04:17 AM)zorrophreak Wrote: Not sure about the writeup but this is something that has circulated in more or less the same form for years.
Agree, hence my question.

It's nothing new.

I did actually hear about one of the replica manufacturers in China using this method to obtain the "boost" material found in Adidas Ultraboost shoes by removing the boost material for use on their reps and return with "boost" made from crumbling Styrofoam. So if anyone is interested in making reps that's one way to do it...I guess.
You can find me on Keybase
"Reach the state of ubiquity, and you will be in control"
Student, Technician, Designer, and more.
[Image: YUpAMpx.png]

Reply