[mothered]

based on the information page it is 200gr
(even though in the tech sheet on the brand website it weights 167gr, so I don't know if the 200gr on amz refers to the watch or watch+packaging)

If you can conclusively locate the "Item weight" and It's under the 120 gram limit, the EB/missing Item method can be used.

[pxl_rip]

based on the information page it is 200gr
(even though in the tech sheet on the brand website it weights 167gr, so I don't know if the 200gr on amz refers to the watch or watch+packaging)

If you can conclusively locate the "Item weight" and It's under the 120 gram limit, the EB/missing Item method can be used.

As I said the correct one is from the official spec sheet 167gr

[mothered]

As I said the correct one is from the official spec sheet 167gr

I understand that, but as per your comment below, you're questioning Amazon's listing - which suggests you're not certain on the Item weight.

I don't know if the 200gr on amz refers to the watch or watch+packaging

Given you're going by the spec sheet, you've answered your own question pertaining to Amazon. That aside, I had the EB/missing Item method In mind, but It's a tad too heavy. The DNA, wrong Item received or boxing method can be used.

[pxl_rip]

As I said the correct one is from the official spec sheet 167gr

I understand that, but as per your comment below, you're questioning Amazon's listing - which suggests you're not certain on the Item weight.

I don't know if the 200gr on amz refers to the watch or watch+packaging

Given you're going by the spec sheet, you've answered your own question pertaining to Amazon. That aside, I had the EB/missing Item method In mind, but It's a tad too heavy. The DNA, wrong Item received or boxing method can be used.

Let's put one second in pause the SE on .it domain.
You have to excuse me for the confusion i'm creating between the two domain, but i've an update on .co.jp.
Today i received my two legit orders. In total on .jp i did tre legit orders each one for a small amount of euros.
The next order is the one i want to SE.

The problem is that i noticed for the three legit orders is that on the proof of delivery on dhl (.co.jp domain ships only with dhl) there is the sign of my doorman. Where I live all of the shippings are received by him.
Is this a problem for a DNA method? I don't want to put him in trouble.

[mothered]

The problem is that i noticed for the three legit orders is that on the proof of delivery on dhl (.co.jp domain ships only with dhl) there is the sign of my doorman. Where I live all of the shippings are received by him.
Is this a problem for a DNA method? I don't want to put him in trouble.

Unless you're well-acquainted with the other person (In your case, the doorman), It's not good practice to Involve others with your SE.

It may Impact on him as well as your claim, for the fact that he's not part of your social engineering activities.

[pxl_rip]

The problem is that i noticed for the three legit orders is that on the proof of delivery on dhl (.co.jp domain ships only with dhl) there is the sign of my doorman. Where I live all of the shippings are received by him.
Is this a problem for a DNA method? I don't want to put him in trouble.

Unless you're well-acquainted with the other person (In your case, the doorman), It's not good practice to Involve others with your SE.

It may Impact on him as well as your claim, for the fact that he's not part of your social engineering activities.

In reality I think all of the carriers write the doorman sign by themselves.
I'm friend of the doorman but I don't want to run risks.
Do you think DNA is suitable for this situation or I have to go with wrong item for example? Is this method working for two objects? (a watch and a camera lens)

You have to esxcuse me for all of this bothering but I want to minimize risks as much as possible.

[mothered]

In reality I think all of the carriers write the doorman sign by themselves.
I'm friend of the doorman but I don't want to run risks.
Do you think DNA is suitable for this situation

Personally, for the reasons stated In my previous post, I wouldn't get the doorman Involved.

or I have to go with wrong item for example? Is this method working for two objects? (a watch and a camera lens)

Target only the one Item.

It's very unlikely two wrong Items were picked & packed on the same order.

You have to esxcuse me for all of this bothering but I want to minimize risks as much as possible.

No problem at all.

[pxl_rip]

In reality I think all of the carriers write the doorman sign by themselves.
I'm friend of the doorman but I don't want to run risks.
Do you think DNA is suitable for this situation

Personally, for the reasons stated In my previous post, I wouldn't get the doorman Involved.

or I have to go with wrong item for example? Is this method working for two objects? (a watch and a camera lens)

Target only the one Item.

It's very unlikely two wrong Items were picked & packed on the same order.

You have to esxcuse me for all of this bothering but I want to minimize risks as much as possible.

No problem at all.

Ok, i ignore DNA for now, i dont want nobody to get involved in my se.
But so another question rises.
An EB method doesn't work if I buy in the same order a much more heavy item 1.5kg and 200gr for the watch?

[mothered]

Ok, i ignore DNA for now, i dont want nobody to get involved in my se.

Good move

But so another question rises.
An EB method doesn't work if I buy in the same order a much more heavy item 1.5kg and 200gr for the watch?

They'll deduct the weight of the heavy Item, and the balance (weight) of the package will determine If the watch was enclosed.