[fsociety]

DOWNLOAD

https://www72.zippyshare.com/v/dQ4v6YT7/file.html

VIRUS REPORT

https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/c563.../detection


=================

Updated on Blog also : https://www.anonfam.com/2021/04/mailify-...-2021.html

=====================

JOIN US ON TELEGRAM

[Removed by staff.][/color]][Removed by staff.]

[mothered]

Due to the nature of the tool, I expected a lot more detections.

That aside, thanks for the direct link and the VT report of the executable.

[fritz]

Is it only a checker ?

Due to the nature of the tool, I expected a lot more detections.

For checkers ? Why would you expect any ? When I make a checker it's not detected as malicious obviously, checkers are just normal programs.
Although I doubt Trojan:Win32/Wacatac is part of the "features"..

[laininthewired]

Is it only a checker ?

Due to the nature of the tool, I expected a lot more detections.

For checkers ? Why would you expect any ? When I make a checker it's not detected as malicious obviously, checkers are just normal programs.
Although I doubt Trojan:Win32/Wacatac is part of the "features"..

Usually windows flags the tool as it checks for alot of sites. Also tools like these tend to be stuffed with RATs.

[GeneralPoose]

This tool has been the talk of the town lately. I used it and it isn't bad.

[mothered]

Also tools like these tend to be stuffed with RATs.

This ^

When I make a checker it's not detected as malicious obviously

I'm not referring to privately-coded checkers that're yet to be made community property.

For checkers ? Why would you expect any ?

It's pretty obvious.

Apart from many being Infected, as with this case, false positives.

[fritz]

When I make a checker it's not detected as malicious obviously

I'm not referring to privately-coded checkers that're yet to be made community property.

For checkers ? Why would you expect any ?

It's pretty obvious.

Apart from many being Infected, as with this case, false positives.

I'm obviously talking about apparently unrelated detections, like Wacatac trojan here.

Also tools like these tend to be stuffed with RATs.

This ^

Exactly, but I prefer to not encourage this

[mothered]

I'm obviously talking about apparently unrelated detections

Evidently, that's stating the absolute obvious with each and every tool.

I'm talking about tools that (for example) have been obfuscated producing false positive detections, and those circulating the net through so many hands, hence likely to be tampered with. All of which, Is consistent with checkers and the like.
Back on-topic.

[007]

Thank you for this. it seems pretty cool xD

[cracking123]

thanks for that, i very happy wqitg ythat and i dont know wahat to say more, ALALA