![]() |
|
GOOGLE PIXEL ? ANY NEW MTHDS FOR GOOGLE? - Printable Version +- Sinisterly (https://sinister.li) +-- Forum: Hacking (https://sinister.li/Forum-Hacking) +--- Forum: Social Engineering (https://sinister.li/Forum-Social-Engineering) +--- Thread: GOOGLE PIXEL ? ANY NEW MTHDS FOR GOOGLE? (/Thread-GOOGLE-PIXEL-ANY-NEW-MTHDS-FOR-GOOGLE) Pages:
1
2
|
GOOGLE PIXEL ? ANY NEW MTHDS FOR GOOGLE? - Amazun - 07-20-2018 Well the old one is patched if someone know an new one please pm me I am willing to buy and if u want share it for free I don't mind :p RE: GOOGLE PIXEL ? ANY NEW MTHDS FOR GOOGLE? - Vultra - 07-20-2018 Who was the old method made by? RE: GOOGLE PIXEL ? ANY NEW MTHDS FOR GOOGLE? - mothered - 07-20-2018 (07-20-2018, 11:30 AM)Mimiakira Wrote: Who was the old method made by? Not only this, but what exactly did It entail? If we know precisely what was patched, we'll have some grounds to work with when providing new methods. RE: GOOGLE PIXEL ? ANY NEW MTHDS FOR GOOGLE? - Amazun - 07-20-2018 (07-20-2018, 11:36 AM)mothered Wrote:(07-20-2018, 11:30 AM)Mimiakira Wrote: Who was the old method made by? Well as you know they are asking for first email was used in phone + Order ID as well so kinda difficult to bypass you know RE: GOOGLE PIXEL ? ANY NEW MTHDS FOR GOOGLE? - DragonicRek - 07-20-2018 (07-20-2018, 11:30 AM)Mimiakira Wrote: Who was the old method made by? There is no specific person. The methods just got leaked and soon enough, everyone knew the methods Google patched it a couple weeks ago, so it is much harder but still possible RE: GOOGLE PIXEL ? ANY NEW MTHDS FOR GOOGLE? - DragonicRek - 07-20-2018 (07-20-2018, 10:53 AM)Amazun Wrote: Well the old one is patched if someone know an new one please pm me I am willing to buy and if u want share it for free I don't mind :p I have a method that still works. I probably won't share it because It's going to get saturated and will make us have to think of new methods Edit: Also one thing I forgot to mention. I think that it's better to leave google alone for a couple of months before you try anything, They've worked with the FBI very recently. and so I wouldn't mess around with that. That's just my 2 cents RE: GOOGLE PIXEL ? ANY NEW MTHDS FOR GOOGLE? - Amazun - 07-21-2018 (07-20-2018, 12:48 PM)GosuSang Wrote:(07-20-2018, 10:53 AM)Amazun Wrote: Well the old one is patched if someone know an new one please pm me I am willing to buy and if u want share it for free I don't mind :p I don't care people still buying them and having no problems so If you are interested in selling your method to me you have my discord
RE: GOOGLE PIXEL ? ANY NEW MTHDS FOR GOOGLE? - DragonicRek - 07-21-2018 (07-21-2018, 10:40 AM)Amazun Wrote:(07-20-2018, 12:48 PM)GosuSang Wrote:(07-20-2018, 10:53 AM)Amazun Wrote: Well the old one is patched if someone know an new one please pm me I am willing to buy and if u want share it for free I don't mind :p Not going to share my method sorry. Don't get me wrong, I do care about this subforum and about teaching others. Just that I need to understand that sometimes, too much helping is for the worse. e.g. If I made public tutorials for all the methods I knew, the companies would patch it very soon and make it harder for us to SE Hope you understand RE: GOOGLE PIXEL ? ANY NEW MTHDS FOR GOOGLE? - Amazun - 07-21-2018 (07-21-2018, 10:44 AM)GosuSang Wrote:(07-21-2018, 10:40 AM)Amazun Wrote:(07-20-2018, 12:48 PM)GosuSang Wrote: I have a method that still works. I probably won't share it because It's going to get saturated and will make us have to think of new methods I was going to pay for it and also ofc I wont leak it I was going to use it for personal use anyway u are free. RE: GOOGLE PIXEL ? ANY NEW MTHDS FOR GOOGLE? - DragonicRek - 07-21-2018 (07-21-2018, 10:47 AM)Amazun Wrote:(07-21-2018, 10:44 AM)GosuSang Wrote:(07-21-2018, 10:40 AM)Amazun Wrote: I don't care people still buying them and having no problems so If you are interested in selling your method to me you have my discord Thank you for understanding. If I do change my mind, I will let you know. Even though I'm not giving you the method, I strongly recommend you to experiment*! *experiment responsibly of course |