Sinisterly
Tutorial delete - Printable Version

+- Sinisterly (https://sinister.li)
+-- Forum: Hacking (https://sinister.li/Forum-Hacking)
+--- Forum: Social Engineering (https://sinister.li/Forum-Social-Engineering)
+--- Thread: Tutorial delete (/Thread-Tutorial-delete--93932)



delete - Skryptec - 01-16-2018

Please delete this thread.


RE: Ghostek Method by Skryptec - mprola - 01-16-2018

wow nice one big thx skryptec Wink


RE: Ghostek Method by Skryptec - zorrophreak - 01-16-2018

Tried Ghostek headphones in the past. Not my favorite but definitely worth it, especially regarding the price.

Cheers on the success just by pushing forward!


RE: Ghostek Method by Skryptec - mothered - 01-17-2018

Quote:Bla, bla, bla they keep on saying this, but just keep on pushing.
Quote:Then I told them that they sell it on Amazon and that they are the seller and that I still can't return it to Amazon.
Quote:Then they finally gave up and asked for my shipping address.

Persistence (In a controlled manner and to a certain degree), will see you through most SEing attempts. Though there must be an equilibrium- not too dominant and certainly not submissive. The above clearly demonstrates just that.

Keep up the good work.


RE: Ghostek Method by Skryptec - Skryptec - 01-20-2018

(01-16-2018, 10:42 PM)zorrophreak Wrote: Tried Ghostek headphones in the past. Not my favorite but definitely worth it, especially regarding the price.

Cheers on the success just by pushing forward!

They are not that expensive, but good quality so worth it!


RE: Ghostek Headphones Method by Skryptec - Bish0pQ - 01-20-2018

This is a very nice SE. This shows that persistince is a very good thing when it comes to SE, of course, it can also be bad because it may lead to an investigation. Thanks for this and all your other SE threads!


RE: Ghostek Headphones Method by Skryptec - Defeat - 01-20-2018

Thank you for sharing. I just sent in an email. I noticed that their security code thing is messed, took too many attempts. Might be because I'm not currently wearing my glasses, but my vision isn't that bad


RE: Ghostek Headphones Method by Skryptec - FunkyG - 01-21-2018

Thanks for the tutorial <3
Love all of your tuts!


RE: Ghostek Headphones Method by Skryptec - Skryptec - 01-21-2018

(01-20-2018, 10:18 PM)Bish0pQ Wrote: This is a very nice SE. This shows that persistince is a very good thing when it comes to SE, of course, it can also be bad because it may lead to an investigation. Thanks for this and all your other SE threads!

Thank you for the feedback!

(01-20-2018, 11:07 PM)Strait McCool Wrote: Thank you for sharing. I just sent in an email. I noticed that their security code thing is messed, took too many attempts. Might be because I'm not currently wearing my glasses, but my vision isn't that bad

Let us know how the process goes! Might be useful for other people as well.

(01-21-2018, 12:22 AM)FunkyG Wrote: Thanks for the tutorial <3
Love all of your tuts!

Thank you for your feedback and enjoy.