+- Sinisterly (https://sinister.li)
+-- Forum: Computers (https://sinister.li/Forum-Computers)
+--- Forum: Software & Programs (https://sinister.li/Forum-Software-Programs)
+--- Thread: Periodic Table of SEO Success (/Thread-Periodic-Table-of-SEO-Success)
Pages:
1
2
Periodic Table of SEO Success - Maximum - 10-04-2015
![[Image: K4D7hmd.jpg]](https://i.imgur.com/K4D7hmd.jpg)
RE: Periodic Table of SEO Success - m0dem - 10-05-2015
Thanks for the share! It looks really interesting!
BTW: For those wanting more content like this, go to the original site at: http://searchengineland.com/seotable
RE: Periodic Table of SEO Success - Coca. - 10-07-2015
This is an extremely useless thread. Please at least explain shit instead of posting some shitty, hard-to-read image with no point and for NSP.
RE: Periodic Table of SEO Success - The Real Slim Shady - 10-07-2015
(10-07-2015, 05:36 AM)Coca. Wrote: This is an extremely useless thread. Please at least explain shit instead of posting some shitty, hard-to-read image with no point and for NSP.
1. If this image is accurate (I'm not an expert enough in the subject to determine validity), it would quite a useful post if you care about SEO.
2. The image can be opened in a new window, and sized so that it's not hard to read.
3. Took me all of about 5-10 seconds to figure out what this image was trying to convey. I had no need for any explanation. It is a bit gimmicky, but it's not complicated to figure out...
RE: Periodic Table of SEO Success - Coca. - 10-07-2015
(10-07-2015, 05:57 AM)The Real Slim Shady Wrote: 1. If this image is accurate (I'm not an expert enough in the subject to determine validity), it would quite a useful post if you care about SEO.
2. The image can be opened in a new window, and sized so that it's not hard to read.
3. Took me all of about 5-10 seconds to figure out what this image was trying to convey. I had no need for any explanation. It is a bit gimmicky, but it's not complicated to figure out...
Although true, just posting a fucking image as a thread with no words or at least a single one-sentence description seems like a hog for NSP.
RE: Periodic Table of SEO Success - Megan - 10-07-2015
(10-07-2015, 06:48 AM)Coca. Wrote: Although true, just posting a fucking image as a thread with no words or at least a single one-sentence description seems like a hog for NSP.
You are correct, I've noticed several shit quality posts from this user...
RE: Periodic Table of SEO Success - mothered - 10-07-2015
I've had no Issues with the Image. It opened In a new window and upon magnifying It, It's clearly legible.
I must say, there's a handful of Informative points.
RE: Periodic Table of SEO Success - Coca. - 10-08-2015
(10-07-2015, 10:59 AM)mothered Wrote: I've had no Issues with the Image. It opened In a new window and upon magnifying It, It's clearly legible.
I must say, there's a handful of Informative points.
It's not just about the problem with the image. Also, I don't see how one word is an "informative point". This is no shit a grabber for NSP.
RE: Periodic Table of SEO Success - mothered - 10-08-2015
(10-08-2015, 03:12 AM)Coca. Wrote: It's not just about the problem with the image. Also, I don't see how one word is an "informative point". This is no shit a grabber for NSP.
Given you're banned, you'll probably never respond to this. Still, I'd like to say my views.
The Image Isn't a problem, I mentioned that In my previous post. A simple zoom, and It's legible and the Image Itself, speaks a thousand words.
RE: Periodic Table of SEO Success - Megan - 10-08-2015
(10-08-2015, 10:54 AM)mothered Wrote: Given you're banned, you'll probably never respond to this. Still, I'd like to say my views.
The Image Isn't a problem, I mentioned that In my previous post. A simple zoom, and It's legible and the Image Itself, speaks a thousand words.
lool, he'll be back.
It's a good image, but I just feel like OP could've made more of an effort to contribute.