+- Sinisterly (https://sinister.li)
+-- Forum: General (https://sinister.li/Forum-General)
+--- Forum: The Lounge (https://sinister.li/Forum-The-Lounge)
+--- Thread: Come on! (/Thread-Come-on)
Pages:
1
2
Come on! - Sirius - 04-30-2013
Cmon guys, 8,900 posts in 720 threads...
Can you understand this? People will know that's spammy when having 8,900 posts on only 720 threads..
I suggest we stop making threads like " Last comment is the winner " and these spammy things.
You could start doing these one time posting threads, example a history you can continue only 1 post on the thread is allowed..
Think about 8,900 posts in 720 threads...
Peace out, Hawk.
RE: Come on! - Diamond_CnC - 04-30-2013
1 post per thread? That's pointless.. This is a forum. Were here to talk.
RE: Come on! - Chuck - 04-30-2013
(04-30-2013, 10:32 PM)Diamond Wrote: 1 post per thread? That's pointless.. This is a forum. Were here to talk.
Posting forum games such as "Count to 1,000" isn't 'talking'.
I agree with you one-hundred and ten percent, Hawk. Far too many members' are creating low quality postings and it's beginning to clutter the forums. Not only that, we are also scaring-off potential newcomers. I will seek further advice with Wonders to see what can be done about the issue.
Thank you for voicing your concern.
I have moved your thread to the 'Suggestions, Feedback & Comments' forum.
RE: Come on! - Diamond_CnC - 04-30-2013
(04-30-2013, 10:49 PM)Chuck Wrote: Posting forum games such as "Count to 1,000" isn't 'talking'.
I agree with you one-hundred and ten percent, Hawk. Far too many members' are creating low quality postings and it's beginning to clutter the forums. Not only that, we are also scaring-off potential newcomers. I will seek further advice with Wonders to see what can be done about the issue.
Thank you for voicing your concern.
I have moved your thread to the 'Suggestions, Feedback & Comments' forum.
Wonder's posts in that thread, and he doesn't have a problem with it he said this forum needs as many posts as possible. Not trying to argue though.
RE: Come on! - Chuck - 04-30-2013
(04-30-2013, 10:51 PM)Diamond Wrote: Wonder's posts in that thread, and he doesn't have a problem with it he said this forum needs as many posts as possible. Not trying to argue though.
I believe Wonders would have meant high quality postings - not three word responses. You claimed most of the postings come from other members' communicating via 'talking' which clearly is not the case.
RE: Come on! - Diamond_CnC - 04-30-2013
(04-30-2013, 10:53 PM)Chuck Wrote:I believe Wonders would have meant high quality postings - not three word responses. You claimed most of the postings come from other members' communicating via 'talking' which clearly is not the case.
true that. staff always own me...
RE: Come on! - Preside - 04-30-2013
(04-30-2013, 10:49 PM)Chuck Wrote: Posting forum games such as "Count to 1,000" isn't 'talking'.
I agree with you one-hundred and ten percent, Hawk. Far too many members' are creating low quality postings and it's beginning to clutter the forums. Not only that, we are also scaring-off potential newcomers. I will seek further advice with Wonders to see what can be done about the issue.
Thank you for voicing your concern.
I have moved your thread to the 'Suggestions, Feedback & Comments' forum.
I would have figured staff would have been giving warnings out if that was the case. But since I haven't seen anyone with warnings for LQ posting, I thought it was alright and I bet lots of other people thought the same.
RE: Come on! - Chuck - 04-30-2013
(04-30-2013, 10:56 PM)Preside Wrote:
I would have figured staff would have been giving warnings out if that was the case. But since I haven't seen anyone with warnings for LQ posting, I thought it was alright and I bet lots of other people thought the same.
I issued a warning to a 'well-known' member just over twenty-minutes ago. We haven't been 'formally' issuing infraction points (highest form of warning someone before a suspension) due to the fact the community is still young. Clearly this is not the case and tougher punishment is needed.
RE: Come on! - Preside - 04-30-2013
(04-30-2013, 11:00 PM)Chuck Wrote:I issued a warning to a 'well-known' member just over twenty-minutes ago. We haven't been 'formally' issuing infraction points (highest form of warning someone before a suspension) due to the fact the community is still young. Clearly this is not the case and tougher punishment is needed.
Well it was JUST 20 minutes ago. There have been so many LQ posts for weeks! I bet if you did it a few more times, the amount on LQ posts would rapidly decrease! I personally have never seen anyone with warning and I'm sure most other people haven't either.
RE: Come on! - Alex - 04-30-2013
I agree, if I had the time I could have 200+ reports