![]() |
|
More than 198 million people now use an adblocker - Printable Version +- Sinisterly (https://sinister.li) +-- Forum: General (https://sinister.li/Forum-General) +--- Forum: World News (https://sinister.li/Forum-World-News) +--- Thread: More than 198 million people now use an adblocker (/Thread-More-than-198-million-people-now-use-an-adblocker) |
More than 198 million people now use an adblocker - DarkKnight - 08-11-2015 Quote:No surprise here: adblocking is on the rise in 2015, having gone up by 41 percent since last year. Source Seriously, who likes ads? RE: More than 198 million people now use an adblocker - BlueScreen - 08-11-2015 I feel like those numbers are highly inflated considering the amount of browsers and devices people have. I personally can account for at least 10 of those numbers. >seriously, who likes ads Well, its either that or the web goes back to using paid subscriptions on every thing. Personally I only use adblockers on sites that I don't want to support such as this site (bad joke?), a couple of shady news sites and youtube. Other than that I tend to keep it off as much as I can and click ads when they interest me. RE: More than 198 million people now use an adblocker - Oni - 08-11-2015 People hate ads (and I do too), but a lot of sites need them to stay running. Accepting donations is a good alternative. RE: More than 198 million people now use an adblocker - DarkKnight - 08-11-2015 (08-11-2015, 03:10 PM)Oni Wrote: People hate ads (and I do too), but a lot of sites need them to stay running. Accepting donations is a good alternative. I userstand your point, using donations is a good alternative but then again not many people donate. RE: More than 198 million people now use an adblocker - Oni - 08-11-2015 (08-11-2015, 03:15 PM)Kaori Wrote: That's why you give an incentive to donating. Or you can be like Wikipedia.
RE: More than 198 million people now use an adblocker - Dyme - 08-11-2015 (08-11-2015, 03:16 PM)Oni Wrote: Or you can be like Wikipedia. Wikipedia is legit tho imagine the internet without it. RE: More than 198 million people now use an adblocker - Customer - 08-11-2015 A lot of sites do need it, but I think it's the idea of everyone going "Well, it won't hurt if it's just me." Or maybe people just don't care.. RE: More than 198 million people now use an adblocker - mothered - 08-12-2015 Given It's an extension/addon, whilst It blocks unwanted ads, as a result It can also consume more memory (ram) than It needs to. For example, If you have 30 tabs open (I easily work with that amount and more), and each tab has ads to some degree, AdBlock will consume physical ram to block each and every ad In each and every open tab. Let's say It uses 40MB of ram (which I've personally experienced) to block ads per tab. Multiply that by 30, and there's 1.2GB of ram being consumed simply by an extension. Don't get me wrong, It does serve It's purpose well, but what's gained In one aspect, Is lost In another. RE: More than 198 million people now use an adblocker - BlueScreen - 08-13-2015 (08-12-2015, 12:32 PM)mothered Wrote: Given It's an extension/addon, whilst It blocks unwanted ads, as a result It can also consume more memory (ram) than It needs to. >Not using ublock origin with firefox https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/ublock-origin/ Blind? Listen to the audio version instead: http://vocaroo.com/i/s1vbadz9Oph3 RE: More than 198 million people now use an adblocker - mothered - 08-14-2015 (08-13-2015, 03:13 PM)BlueScreen Wrote: >Not using ublock origin with firefox They mention uBlock Is quote: "Easy on CPU and memory". What's their definition of easy? There's no documentation on how and why It's light on system resources, hence until I put It to the test, their words mean nothing to me. |