![]() |
|
The RAT's Crew Spreading Guide - Project Spread - Printable Version +- Sinisterly (https://sinister.li) +-- Forum: Hacking (https://sinister.li/Forum-Hacking) +--- Forum: Tutorials (https://sinister.li/Forum-Tutorials) +--- Thread: The RAT's Crew Spreading Guide - Project Spread (/Thread-The-RAT-s-Crew-Spreading-Guide-Project-Spread) Pages:
1
2
|
The RAT's Crew Spreading Guide - Project Spread - Asuna_mybb_import7736 - 04-08-2013 Hello there. As you can tell, this E-book will learn you pretty much all spreading methods possible. A must have for all RATters out there. There's no screen avaible, sorry. This doesn't include any surveys. Only Adfly x2. DL: http://adf.ly/MVYD9 RE: The RAT's Crew Spreading Guide - Project Spread - 3r3bus - 04-08-2013 Very good sir, continue the good work. RE: The RAT's Crew Spreading Guide - Project Spread - Linuxephus™ - 04-08-2013 (04-08-2013, 07:16 AM)3r3bu$ Wrote: Very good sir, continue the good work. Sir happens to be of the female persuasion good Sir.
RE: The RAT's Crew Spreading Guide - Project Spread - 3r3bus - 04-08-2013 (04-08-2013, 07:36 AM)Linuxephus Wrote:What?(04-08-2013, 07:16 AM)3r3bu$ Wrote: Very good sir, continue the good work. RE: The RAT's Crew Spreading Guide - Project Spread - Linuxephus™ - 04-08-2013 (04-08-2013, 07:45 AM)3r3bu$ Wrote: What? ILoveYou is a female, not a male to put it simply.:lol: RE: The RAT's Crew Spreading Guide - Project Spread - 3r3bus - 04-08-2013 (04-08-2013, 07:47 AM)Linuxephus Wrote:No such thing as women on the internet, just sissy neck-beard faggots.(04-08-2013, 07:45 AM)3r3bu$ Wrote: What? RE: The RAT's Crew Spreading Guide - Project Spread - Linuxephus™ - 04-08-2013 (04-08-2013, 08:08 AM)3r3bu$ Wrote: No such thing as women on the internet, just sissy neck-beard faggots. Logic dictates the only possible reason you would even know that is if one of those "sissy neck-bearded faggots" took advantage of you at some point in the past?:lol: Be that as it may, not every female is the "sissy sucking, assclown neck-bearded faggot" that some indeed do attempt to hide the fact thereof. No matter how good freaks like that are at hiding an identity behind that of a false female profile, words and the context of those words has always been the tell tale sign of something being amiss in cases such as that. P.S.-You don't believe ILoveYou to be someone like that anymore than I do. Other than the very amused chuckle derived from such a description on the premise of poking fun at her. ![]() P.S.S.-I love it when you type dirty to me.:lub: :oO: RE: The RAT's Crew Spreading Guide - Project Spread - 3r3bus - 04-09-2013 (04-08-2013, 08:51 PM)Linuxephus Wrote:"Logic dictates the only possible reason you would even know that is if one of those "sissy neck-bearded faggots" took advantage of you at some point in the past?"(04-08-2013, 08:08 AM)3r3bu$ Wrote: No such thing as women on the internet, just sissy neck-beard faggots. You really have no idea what the fuck you're rambling about, do you? Regardless, I'm just going to go with it as you've backed your response with a somewhat level of sophistication regarding your writing style, which therefor deems it correct. "I love it when you type dirty to me". Who doesn't? Get the fuck in line. RE: The RAT's Crew Spreading Guide - Project Spread - 3r3bus - 04-09-2013 (04-08-2013, 08:51 PM)Linuxephus Wrote:"Logic dictates the only possible reason you would even know that is if one of those "sissy neck-bearded faggots" took advantage of you at some point in the past?"(04-08-2013, 08:08 AM)3r3bu$ Wrote: No such thing as women on the internet, just sissy neck-beard faggots. You really have no idea what the fuck you're rambling about, do you? Regardless, I'm just going to go with it as you've backed your response with a somewhat level of sophistication regarding your writing style, which therefor deems it correct. "I love it when you type dirty to me". Who doesn't? Get the fuck in line. RE: The RAT's Crew Spreading Guide - Project Spread - Linuxephus™ - 04-09-2013 3r3bu$: "You really have no idea what the fudge you're rambling about, do you? Regardless, I'm just going to go with it as you've backed your response with a somewhat level of sophistication regarding your writing style, which therefore deems it correct." -->>On the contrary my good fellow, I doubt the voracity in which you had any ideal in what it was you were rambling about, which in turn lead to the rambling that I rambled forthwith about, leaving you on the side of clueless pertaining to both sets of rambling. ![]() After all, I should know exactly what it is I ramble about concerning I'm the individual rambling about your befuddled ramblings. Therefore, I conclude it is you who are clueless about all of the above ramblings. "Who doesn't? Get the fudge in line." -->>Of course you would have a question to that if you were the very first in line to receive the very "fudge" you yourself offer others getting in line.:lol: |