+- Sinisterly (https://sinister.li)
+-- Forum: Hacking (https://sinister.li/Forum-Hacking)
+--- Forum: Website & Server Hacking (https://sinister.li/Forum-Website-Server-Hacking)
+--- Thread: [250+] Vulnerable sites (/Thread-250-Vulnerable-sites)
Pages:
1
2
[250+] Vulnerable sites - i0xIllusi0n - 03-10-2013
Thought I'd share a list, if you find a vuln and exploit it, please add me in the credits for finding the vuln you used.
Code:
http://pastebin.com/jBt2L53aRE: [250+] Vulnerable sites - TechSaavy - 03-26-2013
Thanks for sharing this!
I was in need of a list like that one
RE: [250+] Vulnerable sites - Oni - 03-26-2013
Found them using dorks?
RE: [250+] Vulnerable sites - Daaksin - 04-29-2013
20/10 for this share.
Thank you!
RE: [250+] Vulnerable sites - i0xIllusi0n - 04-29-2013
(04-29-2013, 10:24 AM)Daaksin Wrote: 20/10 for this share.
Thank you!
I'd prefer if you actually said something more useful. This thread is outdated anyways.
RE: [250+] Vulnerable sites - Daaksin - 04-30-2013
(04-29-2013, 03:33 PM)i0xIllusi0n Wrote:(04-29-2013, 10:24 AM)Daaksin Wrote: 20/10 for this share.
Thank you!
I'd prefer if you actually said something more useful. This thread is outdated anyways.
What is more "useful" then? Please enlighten me. I simply thanked you for this share. What do you expect I say? "Nice, but I've seen bigger and better." I'm actually being serious, I have no idea what I've done wrong here. However, I'll withold these comments from you in future.
RE: [250+] Vulnerable sites - Nefarious - 04-30-2013
(04-30-2013, 09:49 AM)Daaksin Wrote:(04-29-2013, 03:33 PM)i0xIllusi0n Wrote:(04-29-2013, 10:24 AM)Daaksin Wrote: 20/10 for this share.
Thank you!
I'd prefer if you actually said something more useful. This thread is outdated anyways.
What is more "useful" then? Please enlighten me. I simply thanked you for this share. What do you expect I say? "Nice, but I've seen bigger and better." I'm actually being serious, I have no idea what I've done wrong here. However, I'll withold these comments from you in future.
You did nothing wrong.
RE: [250+] Vulnerable sites - i0xIllusi0n - 04-30-2013
(04-30-2013, 09:49 AM)Daaksin Wrote:(04-29-2013, 03:33 PM)i0xIllusi0n Wrote:(04-29-2013, 10:24 AM)Daaksin Wrote: 20/10 for this share.
Thank you!
I'd prefer if you actually said something more useful. This thread is outdated anyways.
What is more "useful" then? Please enlighten me. I simply thanked you for this share. What do you expect I say? "Nice, but I've seen bigger and better." I'm actually being serious, I have no idea what I've done wrong here. However, I'll withold these comments from you in future.
It's the fact that all you said was "thank you."
The world would be a much better place if people didn't post like that.
RE: [250+] Vulnerable sites - Daaksin - 05-01-2013
(04-30-2013, 03:06 PM)i0xIllusi0n Wrote:(04-30-2013, 09:49 AM)Daaksin Wrote:(04-29-2013, 03:33 PM)i0xIllusi0n Wrote:(04-29-2013, 10:24 AM)Daaksin Wrote: 20/10 for this share.
Thank you!
I'd prefer if you actually said something more useful. This thread is outdated anyways.
What is more "useful" then? Please enlighten me. I simply thanked you for this share. What do you expect I say? "Nice, but I've seen bigger and better." I'm actually being serious, I have no idea what I've done wrong here. However, I'll withold these comments from you in future.
It's the fact that all you said was "thank you."
The world would be a much better place if people didn't post like that.
Post was alright. Most of them have been wrecked anyway.
RE: [250+] Vulnerable sites - i0xIllusi0n - 05-01-2013
Well of course, it's an old thread. Doesn't mean anything about your post, though.