+- Sinisterly (https://sinister.li)
+-- Forum: Design (https://sinister.li/Forum-Design)
+--- Forum: Graphic & Video Design (https://sinister.li/Forum-Graphic-Video-Design)
+--- Thread: +++ Calling out BlueDog [BATTLE] (/Thread-Calling-out-BlueDog-BATTLE)
+++ Calling out BlueDog [BATTLE] - networkZombie - 10-05-2011
Theme: freestyle signature
Time: 1 day
Render/stock: doesnt matter. pick one that you like
size limit: 600 X 200 or smaller
Do you accept?
EDIT: this has to be anonymous for unbiased voting so you cant have your name on it =]
RE: +++ Calling out bluedog [BATTLE] - networkZombie - 10-05-2011
(10-05-2011, 05:46 AM)LoneDevil Wrote: If your going to have a contest I say there needs to be judges.
I volunteer myself as a judge.
thats not how it works. a poll will be posted and people will vote for the better one.
RE: +++ Calling out bluedog [BATTLE] - networkZombie - 10-05-2011
(10-05-2011, 05:48 AM)LoneDevil Wrote: Ahh yes but think of it this way man you been gone a long time and during that time bluedog has handed out alot of signatures so naturally the users are going to favor him so thats why im saying instead of that it needs to be a set of judges who have never recived graphics by either party so neither one is "favored"
thats is not how battles work buddy. and I updated OP - it has to be anonymous. we will not have our names on it so people cant tell who made which one and its unbiased =]
RE: +++ Calling out BlueDog [BATTLE] - Jacob - 10-05-2011
This is pretty good idea. But dont get heated over it and flame and its all fair game.
RE: +++ Calling out BlueDog [BATTLE] - Shining White - 10-05-2011
Say there is a Battle ,
, um gonna watch it , and there should be judges all HC
RE: +++ Calling out BlueDog [BATTLE] - networkZombie - 10-05-2011
nice to see you again shiny and @Jacob who made that sig for you? xD
RE: +++ Calling out BlueDog [BATTLE] - 3r3bus - 10-05-2011
Oh DAMMMM SHIT IS GONA GET UGLY...
I actually agree with LoneDevil he said this: "Ahh yes but think of it this way man you been gone a long time and during that time bluedog has handed out alot of signatures so naturally the users are going to favor him so thats why im saying instead of that it needs to be a set of judges who have never recived graphics by either party so neither one is "favored""
I think that is a great argument...
I never agreed with "Judges" until he said that.
Maybe it a good idea to have judges. Choose some one who is honest who wont be bias.
If you do decide to have judges, i would gladly take that position.
Bluedog does lots for the brotherhood and i don't want people to just vote for him because once upon a time he made me a signature...
There is no doubt that he is a talented GFX artist, and i have plenty of respect for him.
But i do think people will be to bias towards him WHICH IS UNFAIR, I have absolutely nothing against bluedog in fact I freaking love the guy but that doesn't mean i should just vote for him because of that reason...
And i feel people are going to do just that.
So be careful if you are still going to go with the poll voting method.
Goodluck to both of you (If BlueDog accepts ovcourse)
RE: +++ Calling out BlueDog [BATTLE] - networkZombie - 10-05-2011
nonono lol i dont think you guys have seen battles before lol
if you go on some GFX forums you'll see what i mean. its not something that i came up with. people have been battling for a long time. [=
and why wouldnt he accept? not accepting is like an insult lol. in the GFX world anyways
RE: +++ Calling out BlueDog [BATTLE] - networkZombie - 10-05-2011
(10-05-2011, 06:13 AM)LoneDevil Wrote: Plus I just thought of some thing wrong with the anon thing you can tell the differnce between some ones art work from another persons.
Becuase they each have their own "styles" so people will know it was bluedogs work and so on.
that is always a problem with battles unfortunately
go here if you want examples - http://gfxforums.net/forum-graphic-battles
RE: +++ Calling out BlueDog [BATTLE] - Rainbow Dash - 10-05-2011
Hehe this should be interesting