+- Sinisterly (https://sinister.li)
+-- Forum: Coding (https://sinister.li/Forum-Coding)
+--- Forum: C, C++, & Obj-C (https://sinister.li/Forum-C-C-Obj-C)
+--- Thread: Stuxnet source code.! Download. (/Thread-Stuxnet-source-code-Download)
Stuxnet source code.! Download. - ♠J0K3R♠ - 07-03-2011
ONLY FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES!
Title says it. The famous stuxnet's source code has been released..
![[Image: Untitled.png]](http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-hA8k6HUc_Vk/ThAg87Xe4PI/AAAAAAAACX8/3gTaR3-bvik/s1600/Untitled.png)
[link=http://www.multiupload.com/BDNYSCY5PC]Download[/link]
DON'T USE PLEASE!. I AM NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGE IT CAUSES..
I just posted it because i think some people would like to see/study it.
RE: Stuxnet source code.! Download. - 1234hotmaster - 07-03-2011
OMG WHERE YOU GOT THAT? IVE BEEN F***ING MYSELF FINDING IT! IT F***ED UP OUR NUCK FACILITY 5-8 MONTHS AGO :p
RE: Stuxnet source code.! Download. - ♠J0K3R♠ - 07-03-2011
(07-03-2011, 04:33 PM)1234hotmaster Wrote: OMG WHERE YOU GOT THAT? IVE BEEN F***ING MYSELF FINDING IT! IT F***ED UP OUR NUCK FACILITY 5-8 MONTHS AGO :p
:p yeah.. its some cool shit
RE: Stuxnet source code.! Download. - 1llusion - 07-03-2011
Wow nice
Moving it to the right section....also, why the hell does he use so many extern variables? O.o it must take so much memory...
RE: Stuxnet source code.! Download. - ♠J0K3R♠ - 07-03-2011
(07-03-2011, 06:47 PM)1llusion Wrote: Wow nice
also, why the hell does he use so many extern variables? O.o it must take so much memory...
Ah.thought it was the right one..! -.-
RE: Stuxnet source code.! Download. - Fuckedyouover - 07-28-2011
This looks pretty interesting. Anything that slows down those crazy Iranians is a good thing. :rofl:
RE: Stuxnet source code.! Download. - Frooxius - 08-03-2011
It doesn't seem that this is an original source code, somebody decompiled (similar to disassembling, but tries to find common constructs) the binary to the C. That means, that the code is much harder to analyze/read, because of generic names of variables, functions, files and everything, so you have to carefully trace the execution flow, to determine what each generic name actually means and what's its function.
Also might be obfuscated original source, but this looks more like a work of decompiler.
EDIT: Yeah, it's definitely decompiled, now I noticed that it's even in comments in the source files :lol: