![]() |
|
How do you keep async workflows understandable as they grow? - Printable Version +- Sinisterly (https://sinister.li) +-- Forum: Coding (https://sinister.li/Forum-Coding) +--- Forum: Java, JVM, & JRE (https://sinister.li/Forum-Java-JVM-JRE) +--- Thread: How do you keep async workflows understandable as they grow? (/Thread-How-do-you-keep-async-workflows-understandable-as-they-grow) |
How do you keep async workflows understandable as they grow? - Mxstermind - 10-26-2026 A workflow can start simple: receive a request, process it and return a result. Then it grows to include external APIs, retries, rate limits, human approvals and scheduled actions. At that point, I find explicit state transitions and observable job histories more useful than clever abstractions. How do you structure long-running workflows in Java? Do you prefer a state machine, event-driven architecture or a straightforward queue with persisted job states? |