+- Sinisterly (https://sinister.li)
+-- Forum: General (https://sinister.li/Forum-General)
+--- Forum: The Lounge (https://sinister.li/Forum-The-Lounge)
+--- Thread: Zombie Apocalypse: Buckshot Vs Slugs (/Thread-Zombie-Apocalypse-Buckshot-Vs-Slugs)
Zombie Apocalypse: Buckshot Vs Slugs - Demonic - 11-04-2013
Ok! Scenario time!
The zombie apocalypse has struck the world. You've managed to use your abilities to survive the initial panic.
You've managed to scrounge a shotgun and you've found a stockpile of ammo. You only have room for one type of shell.
Buckshot or slugs?
Personally I'd take the slugs. Aim under the neck, shoot, kick launches the shell into the head. Better than the shell splitting into pellets which spread far and have a chance to miss the target. Zombie heads are smaller than the torso of game, which buckshot is made for.
~Demy
RE: Zombie Apocalypse: Buckshot Vs Slugs - Customer - 11-04-2013
Both.
/thread
RE: Zombie Apocalypse: Buckshot Vs Slugs - Demonic - 11-04-2013
(11-04-2013, 10:22 AM)Customer Wrote: Both.
/thread
That goes against the point of the thread.
You can carry only one. (for reasons I can't be bothered to think of an excuse for)
RE: Zombie Apocalypse: Buckshot Vs Slugs - Logic_HF - 11-04-2013
I would have taken slugs like you had said, but with the spread of a buckshot it can hold back more zombies at once, maybe not kill..but definitely give me time to run.
RE: Zombie Apocalypse: Buckshot Vs Slugs - Customer - 11-04-2013
(11-04-2013, 09:58 PM)Demonic Wrote:(11-04-2013, 10:22 AM)Customer Wrote: Both.
/thread
That goes against the point of the thread.
You can carry only one. (for reasons I can't be bothered to think of an excuse for)
Well, then I would take the slugs. However, they're both useful in their own way.
RE: Zombie Apocalypse: Buckshot Vs Slugs - Demonic - 11-04-2013
(11-04-2013, 11:27 PM)Customer Wrote:(11-04-2013, 09:58 PM)Demonic Wrote:(11-04-2013, 10:22 AM)Customer Wrote: Both.
/thread
That goes against the point of the thread.
You can carry only one. (for reasons I can't be bothered to think of an excuse for)
Well, then I would take the slugs. However, they're both useful in their own way.
True.
But really it totally depends on what you want. Whether you want to kill without trouble or slow them down.
RE: Zombie Apocalypse: Buckshot Vs Slugs - Nil - 11-04-2013
Slugs. I'd be a ninja in the post apocalyptic world, all on my own. Analyzing my every move and strategically maneuvering about to avoid any hostile, group situations. I'd only need a precise shot here and there to get what I need. Most of the time, I'd be good with hand combat.
RE: Zombie Apocalypse: Buckshot Vs Slugs - Demonic - 11-04-2013
(11-04-2013, 11:35 PM)Chaos Wrote: Slugs. I'd be a ninja in the post apocalyptic world, all on my own. Analyzing my every move and strategically maneuvering about to avoid any hostile, group situations. I'd only need a precise shot here and there to get what I need. Most of the time, I'd be good with hand combat.
Sounds like we got ourselves a perfect ally for the zombie apoc.
RE: Zombie Apocalypse: Buckshot Vs Slugs - Customer - 11-04-2013
(11-04-2013, 11:29 PM)Demonic Wrote:(11-04-2013, 11:27 PM)Customer Wrote:(11-04-2013, 09:58 PM)Demonic Wrote:(11-04-2013, 10:22 AM)Customer Wrote: Both.
/thread
That goes against the point of the thread.
You can carry only one. (for reasons I can't be bothered to think of an excuse for)
Well, then I would take the slugs. However, they're both useful in their own way.
True.
But really it totally depends on what you want. Whether you want to kill without trouble or slow them down.
Would we get an infinite stock? 'Cause if so, there's probably like a 0.50% of actually wiping every single zombie out on earth.
I could be wrong though.
RE: Zombie Apocalypse: Buckshot Vs Slugs - Demonic - 11-04-2013
(11-04-2013, 11:37 PM)Customer Wrote:(11-04-2013, 11:29 PM)Demonic Wrote:(11-04-2013, 11:27 PM)Customer Wrote:(11-04-2013, 09:58 PM)Demonic Wrote:(11-04-2013, 10:22 AM)Customer Wrote: Both.
/thread
That goes against the point of the thread.
You can carry only one. (for reasons I can't be bothered to think of an excuse for)
Well, then I would take the slugs. However, they're both useful in their own way.
True.
But really it totally depends on what you want. Whether you want to kill without trouble or slow them down.
Would we get an infinite stock? 'Cause if so, there's probably like a 0.50% of actually wiping every single zombie out on earth.
I could be wrong though.
For the purpose of this yeah, you have an infinite amount of either kind of ammo.
But you have to take into account the sound that a shotgun makes when you fire it. That shit will attract zombies left right and center.